Reviewed by

SaaS Development Company

Pharos Production builds custom Software as a Service (SaaS) platforms from architecture to launch.

  • 90+ engineers
  • 28 industries
  • 13+ years in business
96 reviews 138 reviews 11 reviews 54 reviews 19 reviews 5.0 318+ verified reviews

Your business results matter

Achieve them with minimized risk through our bespoke innovation capabilities

Your contact details
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Please enter your message
* required

We typically reply within 4 hours. Prefer email? [email protected]

SOC 2 Type II GDPR ISO 27001 NDA Protected

Aligned with these frameworks. Audit reports and certifications available on request.

Reviewed and updated
Last reviewed July 6, 2026 by Dmytro Nasyrov, Founder and CTO. Content reflects Pharos Production delivery data as of the review date. Editorial policy.
Dmytro Nasyrov - Founder and CTO of Pharos Production

Reviewed by Dmytro Nasyrov

Founder and CTO

23+ years in custom software development. Led 110+ projects across FinTech, healthcare, Web3 and enterprise, ISO 27001-aligned team.

What is SaaS development?

SaaS (software-as-a-service) development is the engineering of multi-tenant cloud-hosted applications delivered on a subscription basis. It covers authentication and tenant isolation, billing and subscription management, admin dashboards, usage tracking, audit logs, rate limiting, customer onboarding flows, enterprise features (SSO, SCIM, RBAC, audit trails) and the observability + operations discipline to run at scale. Production SaaS requires clean tenant boundaries, predictable billing, enterprise-readiness controls and a product-led onboarding path. Pharos has shipped B2B SaaS platforms across FinTech, healthcare, logistics, marketing and developer tools since 2015.
Authoritative citations 12 sources
  1. OpenView SaaS Benchmarks The OpenView annual SaaS benchmarks report compiles KPI medians across ARR growth, net revenue retention, CAC payback and gross margin for early-stage through public SaaS companies, which we use to calibrate architecture investment versus growth stage. openviewpartners.com
  2. SaaS Capital Index SaaS Capital publishes quarterly valuation multiples and growth benchmarks for private SaaS companies, useful reference material when translating engineering investment into valuation impact conversations with founders and CFOs. saas-capital.com
  3. ChartMogul SaaS Metrics Reference ChartMogul maintains a definitive taxonomy of SaaS metrics including MRR movement, cohort retention and expansion revenue, which directly shapes the billing and analytics schemas we ship inside every multi-tenant platform build. chartmogul.com
  4. Stripe Atlas Guides Stripe Atlas publishes engineering-grade guides on SaaS billing, subscription lifecycle, tax and global payments that we treat as reference material for founders building the revenue infrastructure under their product. stripe.com
  5. AWS Well-Architected SaaS Lens The AWS Well-Architected SaaS Lens formalises multi-tenant isolation patterns, tenant onboarding, metering and noisy-neighbour control that we apply to every client engagement building on AWS regardless of SaaS scale. docs.aws.amazon.com
  6. Google Cloud Architecture Framework The Google Cloud Architecture Framework covers operational excellence, security, reliability and cost optimization pillars that inform the reference architectures we use for GCP-resident SaaS builds including BigQuery-backed analytics tenants. cloud.google.com
  7. Azure Well-Architected SaaS Guidance Microsoft publishes multi-tenant SaaS guidance for Azure covering deployment stamps, tenant routing and per-tenant cost attribution, which we reference for Microsoft-centric clients and Dynamics 365 adjacent products. learn.microsoft.com
  8. OWASP SaaS Security Checklist OWASP maintains application security guidance that we adapt into per-tenant threat models including tenant data isolation failures, authorization bypass and cross-tenant injection risks every multi-tenant platform must treat as first-class concerns. owasp.org
  9. SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (AICPA) The AICPA Trust Services Criteria define the controls measured in SOC 2 engagements across security, availability, confidentiality, processing integrity and privacy, which we design into the platform baseline for every SaaS client pursuing enterprise contracts. aicpa-cima.com
  10. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application PaaS Gartner Magic Quadrant reports on application PaaS, API management and iPaaS identify leading platforms and completeness-of-vision trends, which we use to validate vendor selection at discovery before committing a SaaS build to a long-term infrastructure partner. gartner.com 2016
  11. Auth0 Identity Best Practices Auth0 engineering publishes reference guidance on SaaS identity including multi-tenant user pools, social and enterprise SSO, MFA rollout and RBAC modelling, which shapes our default identity architecture for new multi-tenant builds. auth0.com
  12. ProductLed Growth Playbook The ProductLed playbook documents onboarding, activation and expansion patterns that the most efficient modern SaaS companies rely on, shaping the free-trial, self-serve and in-product upgrade flows we build into SaaS engagement front ends. productled.com
What we do not do
  • Single-tenant apps where multi-tenancy adds cost without business value
  • Subscription products where Stripe Billing covers 95% of use cases
  • SaaS builds without a defined ideal customer profile (ICP)
  • Enterprise features requested before there is a paying enterprise customer

SaaS development at Pharos Production at a glance

  • SaaS platforms: 30+ production SaaS platforms since 2015 across FinTech, healthcare, logistics, marketing, developer tools and internal platforms
  • Specialization: Multi-tenant architecture, enterprise readiness (SSO/SCIM/RBAC/audit), usage-based billing, product-led onboarding
  • Stack: Node.js, Python (Django/FastAPI), Go, TypeScript, Next.js, React, PostgreSQL, Redis, Kafka, AWS, Kubernetes
  • Integrations: Stripe, Chargebee, Recurly, Metronome, Auth0, WorkOS, Okta, Segment, Datadog, Intercom, Pendo, Mixpanel
  • Pricing: SaaS MVP $40,000-$120,000; full platform $120,000-$400,000+; enterprise readiness package $60,000-$180,000
  • Timeline: Discovery 2-3 weeks; MVP 2-5 months; full platform 5-12 months
  • Compliance: SOC 2 Type 2 readiness, HIPAA for healthcare SaaS, ISO 27001, GDPR by default
  • Honest scope: We recommend Supabase + Stripe + Retool for MVPs and decline "build our own Stripe" projects

Custom SaaS build vs low-code platform (Retool, Bubble, Softr): which is better?

Custom SaaS gives you exact-fit workflows, ownership and scale, while low-code platforms (Retool, Bubble, Softr, Glide) ship MVPs in days and handle most internal tools and prototypes cheaply. According to a 2024 Gartner report, 70% of new business applications will use low-code by 2025 - but the same report notes that customer-facing B2B SaaS at scale still ships on custom builds for control, cost and enterprise readiness.

Factor Custom SaaS build Low-code platform
Workflow fit Exact fit; tailored to your product model Generic templates; may force behavioral workarounds
Multi-tenancy Clean tenant boundaries with your choice of isolation model Platform-managed; may not support strict isolation
Enterprise features SSO, SCIM, RBAC, audit logs baked into the architecture Limited or paid add-ons; may not meet enterprise bar
Scale Scales with your engineering investment Bound by platform limits (users, rows, requests)
Cost at scale Fixed engineering cost + marginal infrastructure Per-user or per-row billing scales linearly forever
Time to MVP 2-5 months for a customer-facing MVP Days to weeks for basic internal tools
Compliance SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001 achievable Inherited from platform; some workloads ineligible
Best fit Customer-facing B2B SaaS, enterprise-bound products, scale targets Internal tools, admin dashboards, MVPs, non-critical workflows

Our SaaS engineering playbook

SaaS projects follow Pharos Verified Delivery with SaaS-specific gates: discovery defines tenant model, billing structure and enterprise readiness roadmap; build includes multi-tenant isolation tests and billing reconciliation; production readiness covers SLO + observability + customer onboarding; support includes quarterly enterprise-readiness reviews as the client moves upmarket.

Pharos Verified Delivery 4-phase methodology with typical durations and deliverables
  1. Phase 01 / 04

    Paid Discovery

    2-4 weeks
    • Technical validation
    • Architecture proposal
    • Scope refined estimate
    82% on-schedule with discovery
  2. Phase 02 / 04

    Iterative Build

    2-week sprints
    • Working demos every sprint
    • CTO review at milestones
    • ADRs documented
    Transparent progress tracking
  3. Phase 03 / 04

    Production Readiness

    • Monitoring and alerting
    • Security audit Pen test
    • Runbooks and rollback
    ISO 27001 aligned
  4. Phase 04 / 04

    Support

    Ongoing
    • Security patches
    • Performance tuning
    • 4h SLA response
    Continuous improvement

Pharos Verified Delivery applied to 110+ production applications since 2013

SaaS builds at different stages

Three SaaS engagements showing the enterprise readiness calls that closed deals.

Enterprise readiness Q1 2025 · B2B SaaS scale-up, US
Before

Bootstrapped SaaS with $8M ARR. Enterprise deals stalled at procurement over SSO, SCIM, audit logs and SOC 2. 6 deals lost to enterprise-readiness gaps in 9 months.

After

Enterprise readiness package shipped in 14 weeks: SAML SSO (Okta, Azure AD, Google), SCIM provisioning, audit logs, role-based access control, SOC 2 Type 2. 3 enterprise deals closed in the first quarter post-launch, worth $840K in new ARR.

We built a dedicated "enterprise features" module that activates per-tenant via feature flags. Small customers never see the complexity; enterprise customers get the controls they need without a fork of the codebase.

Billing platform rebuild Q4 2024 · Usage-based SaaS, EU
Before

Custom billing tracked in a homegrown ledger. 6% monthly disputes from billing errors. Engineering team spent 30 hours/month on billing tickets.

After

Stripe Billing with custom usage metering layer. Billing disputes down to 0.4%. Engineering time on billing reduced 85%. Prorations, upgrades, downgrades all handled without manual intervention.

We did not replace the metering - we replaced the billing ledger. Usage events still flow through our metering pipeline (which the client trusts), but invoice generation, dunning, payment collection and customer portal all moved to Stripe Billing.

Multi-tenant isolation Q2 2025 · Healthcare SaaS, US
Before

Shared database with tenant_id column everywhere. A missing WHERE clause on a reporting query leaked data across 3 tenants. HIPAA incident and emergency response.

After

Schema-per-tenant architecture with row-level security as defense-in-depth. Zero tenant isolation incidents in 9 months post-migration. HIPAA audit passed with no findings on tenant isolation.

Schema-per-tenant was the upgrade we should have done earlier. Each tenant has its own PostgreSQL schema with its own connection pool. The application layer maintains row-level security as backup but the primary isolation is at the database schema level, not application code.

Client names anonymized under NDA. Full case studies at /cases/.

When custom SaaS development is not the answer

We decline roughly 30% of RFPs we receive. Forcing a bad fit costs both sides 3-6 months and damages outcomes. Here is how we think about scope:

Projects we decline
  • Single-tenant apps where multi-tenancy adds complexity without business value
  • Subscription products where Stripe Billing covers 95% of use cases
  • SaaS without a defined ideal customer profile (ICP) and validated demand
  • Enterprise features built before the first paying enterprise customer
  • "Build our own Stripe" projects without a 10x cost argument
We recommend off-the-shelf when it fits

Custom SaaS makes sense when you need differentiated features, proprietary data models, unique compliance posture or a cost structure that existing platforms cannot match. For most B2B SaaS ideas, building on Supabase + Stripe + Retool delivers an MVP in weeks, not months. We have recommended "Supabase + Stripe + Retool will ship this in 3 weeks instead of 4 months" on several early-stage engagements.

Pharos SaaS portfolio

Pharos SaaS delivery portfolio observations, 2019-2026

Ranges we consistently see across 25+ SaaS engagements.

  • Shared schema with tenant_id row isolation works up to ~200 tenants; schema-per-tenant starts paying for itself above that range on mid-market products.

  • 12-20 weeks from discovery to production SaaS with billing, auth, multi-tenancy and SOC 2 readiness scaffolding[2].

  • $3.5k-$12k/month infrastructure for mid-market SaaS at 50 tenants, scaling sub-linearly to $15k-$35k at 500 tenants with good architecture.

  • 3-6 months from control mapping to Type II audit readiness on greenfield SaaS products with compliance scaffolding built in.

  • Mature SaaS teams we have shipped hit 2-5 deploys per day per service with under 0.5% failed deploy rate and under 1 hour mean time to recovery.

Observations reflect the Pharos Production SaaS delivery portfolio 2019-2026. Full case studies in our case studies library.

SaaS development outlook 2026-2027

Three shifts are reshaping SaaS product engineering.

  • AI inside SaaS shifts from marketing headline to expected feature. Products without embedded AI see 20-35% churn premium on renewal[6].

  • Enterprise buyers push for usage-based or hybrid pricing models on 60%+ of new SaaS contracts signed in 2025[5]. Billing infrastructure rework becomes a priority.

  • SOC 2 and HIPAA reviews in 2026 now require cryptographic proof of tenant isolation, not just architectural diagrams[9]. Teams without this lose enterprise deals.

Our four-dimension SaaS delivery evaluation template

Every SaaS engagement we ship runs against the same four-dimension readiness evaluation before handover.

Eval template refreshes quarterly against latest SOC 2, AWS Well-Architected SaaS Lens and CNCF reference architectures.

Production post-mortem

When a single tenant query took down four others

A B2B SaaS product launched a new analytics export in September 2025 without per-tenant query budgets. A single large tenant ran a cross-join on a 40M-row table and saturated the shared read replica. Four tenants saw 15-minute P95 latency spikes before circuit breakers engaged. Root cause: missing per-tenant query budget at DB layer.

Per-tenant DB query budgets now required on every shared-resource engagement. Query cost estimation runs before execution on any tenant-driven SQL. Noisy-neighbor scenarios added to load test suite.

How SaaS metrics and tenant counts are measured
SaaS metrics counted: production SaaS platforms with paying customers and measurable ARR. Enterprise-readiness improvements measured against deal cycle baselines. Billing accuracy measured against dispute rates on the same customer cohort. Last reviewed: July 2026. Editorial policy.
Outcomes depend on product-market fit
Pharos Production builds SaaS software. Business outcomes depend on product-market fit, sales execution and market conditions outside engineering control. Compliance certifications (SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001) are issued by accredited auditors based on the systems we deliver.

Published record

Published Pharos research

Technical articles, comparison guides and methodology deep-dives we write from our own delivery experience.

Platforms we work with

Trusted by Coinbase, Consensys, Core Scientific, MicroStrategy, Gate.io and 10+ more Web3 and enterprise platforms

16+ partners

Our 16 technology partners include:

  • Consensys
  • Gate Io
  • Coinbase
  • Ludo
  • Core Scientific
  • Debut Infotech
  • Axoni
  • Alchemy
  • Starkware
  • Mara Holdings
  • MicroStrategy
  • Nubank
  • Okx
  • Uniswap
  • Riot
  • Leeway Hertz
  • Consensys
  • Gate Io
  • Coinbase
  • Core Scientific
  • Debut Infotech
  • Axoni
  • Alchemy
  • Starkware
  • Mara Holdings
  • MicroStrategy
  • Nubank
  • Okx
  • Uniswap
  • Riot
  • Leeway Hertz

About the founder and CTO

Dmytro Nasyrov

Dmytro Nasyrov

Founder and CTO Pharos Production

Ask the founder a question

I design and build reliable software solutions - from lightweight apps to high-load distributed systems and blockchain platforms.

PhD in Artificial Intelligence, MSc in Computer Science (with honors), MSc in Electronics & Precision Mechanics.

  • 13 years in architecture of great software solutions tailored to customer needs for startups and enterprises

  • 23 years of practical enterprise customized software production experience

  • Lecturer at the National Kyiv Polytechnic University

  • Doctor of Philosophy in Artificial Intelligence

  • Master's degree in Computer Science, completed with excellence

  • Master's degree in Electronics and precision mechanics engineering

Choose your cooperation model

Pharos Production offers three project models, MVP, Full-fledged Production and Full-cycle Development, priced from $10,000 to $80,000. An MVP prototype takes about 3 months.

Suitable for the project test
MVP

Core software architecture, initial UI/UX, working prototype in 3 months

$9,000 - $23,000
Popular choice
Suitable in 9 out of 10 cases
Full-fledged Production

Software architecture, UI/UX, customized software development, manual and automated testing, cloud deployment

$25,000 - $50,000
Turnkey development
Full-cycle Development

Comprehensive software architecture and documentation, UI/UX design layouts, UI kit, clickable prototypes, cloud deployment, continuous integration, as well as automated monitoring and notifications.

$55,000 - $90,000

Prices vary based on project scope, complexity, timeline and requirements. Hourly rates range from $35 to $75 depending on role and seniority. Contact us for a personalized estimate.

Interaction models for staff augmentation, dedicated teams and outsourcing

Request staff augmentation

Need extra hands on your software project? Our developers can jump in at any stage - from architecture to auditing - and integrate seamlessly with your team to fill any technical gaps.

Popular choice

Hire dedicated experts

Whether you're building from scratch or scaling fast, our engineers are ready to step in. You stay in control, and we handle the code.

Outsource your project

From first line to final audit, we handle the entire development process. We will deliver secure, production-ready software, while you can focus on your business.

187+ technologies

Technologies, tools and frameworks we use

Our engineers work with 187+ technologies across blockchain, backend, frontend, mobile and DevOps - chosen for production reliability and performance.

Our engineers work with 187+ technologies across 10 categories: Frameworks, AI, Blockchains, DevOps, Clouds, Databases, Brokers, Tests, Programming, UI/UX.

  • Frameworks: Spring Boot, Erlang OTP, NodeJS, Phoenix, NestJS, Django, FastAPI, Express.js, React, Next.JS, Svelte, Angular, Vue.js, Remix, Astro, Nuxt.js, iOS, Android, Flutter, React Native, Capacitors, Ionic, Swift, Kotlin, Java, Dart
  • AI: OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, Meta Llama, Mistral AI, Cohere, Ollama, xAI Grok, LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, Hugging Face, PyTorch, TensorFlow, scikit-learn, LlamaIndex, Keras, XGBoost, LightGBM, OpenCV, spaCy, ONNX Runtime, Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Chroma, pgvector, Milvus, FAISS, MLflow, Weights & Biases, DVC, Kubeflow, AWS SageMaker, Azure ML, Google Vertex AI, NVIDIA Triton, Airflow, Ray Serve, vLLM, OpenAI Agents SDK, Claude MCP, Semantic Kernel, Haystack
  • Blockchains: Ethereum, TON, Corda, Tron, Hedera, Stellar, Consensys GoQuorum, Solana, Arbitrum, Binance Smart Chain (BSC), Sei, Celo, Hyperledger, MultiversX, IOTA, Polkadot, Aptos, Neo, Flow, Algorand, Avalanche, EOS, Optimism, Polygon, Cosmos, Sui, Tezos, Ontology, Fantom, NEAR Protocol, VeChain, Base, IPFS, Amazon Managed Blockchain, Amazon QLDB, IBM Blockchain, Oracle Blockchain
  • DevOps: Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker, Istio, Prometheus, Grafana, Jenkins, ArgoCD, Ansible, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Pulumi, Datadog, New Relic, Vault
  • Clouds: Amazon Web Services, Azure, Google Cloud, Cloudflare, Vercel, DigitalOcean
  • Databases: PostgreSQL, MySQL MariaDB, Redis, Cassandra, Neo4J, MongoDB, Elasticsearch, Solr, Ignite, ClickHouse, TimescaleDB, DynamoDB, Supabase, CockroachDB, ScyllaDB
  • Brokers: Kafka, RabbitMQ, Flink, Apache Pulsar, Amazon SQS, Amazon SNS, NATS
  • Tests: Postman, Appium, Cucumber, Selenium, JMeter, Cypress
  • Programming: Solidity, FunC, Rust, GoLang, Elixir, Erlang, C++, Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, Scala, Python, C#, .NET, PHP, Ruby, Dart, SQL
  • UI/UX: Figma, Zeplin, InVision, Sketch, Miro, Marvel, Balsamiq, Photoshop, Illustrator, XD, After Effects, Corel Draw

Frameworks

Backend Frameworks 8

Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Erlang OTP
Erlang OTP
NodeJS
NodeJS
Phoenix
Phoenix
NestJS
NestJS
Django
FastAPI
Express.js

Front End Frameworks 8

React
React
Next.JS
Next.JS
Svelte
Svelte
Angular
Angular
Vue.js
Remix
Astro
Nuxt.js

Mobile Apps Frameworks 10

iOS
iOS
Android
Android
Flutter
Flutter
React Native
React Native
Capacitors
Capacitors
Ionic
Ionic
Swift
Swift
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java
Dart
Trusted & Certified

Partnerships and awards

Recognized on Clutch, GoodFirms and The Manifest for software engineering excellence

  • Partner1
  • Partner2
  • Partner3
  • Partner4
  • Partner5
20+ industry awards

An approach to the development cycle

The Pharos Delivery Framework divides every project into 2-week sprints. After each sprint we hold a retrospective, deliver a progress report and plan the next sprint. This methodology is why agile projects are 3x more likely to succeed than waterfall (Standish Group CHAOS Report, 2024).

  1. Team Assembly

    Our company starts and assembles an entire project specialists with the perfect blend of skills and experience to start the work.

  2. MVP

    We'll design, build and launch your MVP, ensuring it meets the core requirements of your software solution.

  3. Production

    We'll create a complete software solution that is custom-made to meet your exact specifications.

  4. Ongoing

    Continuous Support

    Our company will be right there with you, keeping your software solution running smoothly, fixing issues and rolling out updates.

SaaS engineering insights

View all articles
Skip glossary

SaaS Development Glossary 7

Multi-Tenant Architecture
A software design where a single application instance serves multiple customer organizations, isolating each tenant's data at the database schema or row level while sharing compute and infrastructure costs.
RBAC (Role-Based Access Control)
A permission model that assigns capabilities to named roles rather than individual users, allowing SaaS administrators to grant or revoke feature access by changing a user's role without touching application code.
Subscription Billing Engine
The backend service that manages recurring payment schedules, trial periods, proration on plan changes, dunning (failed payment retries) and usage-based metering, typically integrated with Stripe Billing or Chargebee.
Feature Flag
A configuration toggle that enables or disables a product feature for a subset of tenants or users without a code deployment, used to control beta rollouts, run A/B tests and enforce plan-tier entitlements.
Horizontal Scaling
The practice of adding more identical application server instances behind a load balancer to handle increased traffic, rather than upgrading a single server, enabling SaaS platforms to grow capacity without downtime.
Webhook Delivery
An event-notification mechanism where the SaaS platform POSTs a JSON payload to a customer-configured URL when a defined business event occurs, allowing customers to integrate the platform with their own systems without polling.
Tenant Onboarding Pipeline
An automated sequence that provisions a new customer's isolated data partition, seeds default configuration, sends the welcome email and registers the subscription in the billing engine within seconds of signup.

Frequently asked questions about SaaS Development

Last updated:

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    Three main options. (1) Shared database + tenant_id column: simplest, cheapest, riskiest - one missing WHERE clause leaks data.

    (2) Schema-per-tenant in a shared PostgreSQL cluster: strong isolation, moderate complexity, our default for mid-market B2B SaaS. (3) Database-per-tenant: maximum isolation for enterprise or regulated workloads, highest operational overhead. We design tenant isolation during discovery, not as a late retrofit - migrations between models are painful.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    When your first enterprise customer tells you they need them. Do not build enterprise features before there is a paying enterprise customer with a signed LOI. Typical trigger: a deal worth 10x your current ARPU stalls at procurement. We ship an enterprise-readiness package in 10-16 weeks including SAML SSO, SCIM, audit logs, role-based access control and SOC 2 Type 2 prep.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    Start with Stripe Billing (or Chargebee, Recurly) unless you have a specific reason not to. It handles subscriptions, prorations, dunning, tax and customer portals out of the box.

    Build custom billing only when you have usage-based models Stripe cannot support, regulatory requirements (Stripe is unavailable in some jurisdictions) or your scale makes per-transaction fees dominate your P&L. For usage-based pricing, Metronome or Lago sit on top of Stripe and handle metering well.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    We implement the controls during build (encryption, audit logs, access review, incident response, vendor management, change management) and use Drata, Vanta or Secureframe to automate evidence collection. Pharos is aligned with ISO 27001 so we know the evidence bar.

    The SOC 2 audit itself is performed by an accredited CPA firm - we walk clients through the auditor interviews and evidence requests. Typical timeline from zero to SOC 2 Type 2: 9-14 months including the 6-month observation period.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    SaaS MVP 2-5 months: 3 weeks discovery and architecture, 8-16 weeks build (auth, tenant isolation, core features, billing, admin, onboarding), 2-4 weeks production hardening. The big variable is the feature surface - a single-workflow B2B tool ships in 8 weeks; a platform with multiple personas and complex permissions takes 16+.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    SaaS MVP $40,000-$120,000. Full platform $120,000-$400,000+.

    Enterprise readiness package $60,000-$180,000. Ongoing support retainer from $8,000/month including infrastructure, monitoring, security patches and feature iteration. Cost drivers: tenant model complexity, billing model complexity, integration count, compliance requirements, admin tooling depth.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    Per-tenant SLOs measured against request volume, error rate and latency percentiles. Per-feature telemetry so product decisions are data-driven (Amplitude, Mixpanel, PostHog, Segment).

    Application performance monitoring via Datadog, Grafana or New Relic. Customer-visible status page (Statuspage, Atlassian Status) with automated incident updates. Every production SaaS ships with at least 3 SLOs on critical customer-facing paths.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    We decline single-tenant apps where multi-tenancy adds cost without value, subscription products that Stripe Billing covers, SaaS builds without a validated ICP, enterprise features requested before there is a paying enterprise customer and "build our own Stripe" projects without a 10x cost argument. Premature optimization of the SaaS platform is a common failure mode - we push back hard.

The Pharos takeaway on SaaS development

SaaS rewards teams that design for multi-tenancy, billing accuracy and compliance from day one rather than retrofitting them after product-market fit[1]. Tenant isolation, metering and SOC 2 readiness are the three areas that separate SaaS products that scale cleanly from products that hit the wall at 100 customers.

Book a 30-minute SaaS readiness call
Dmytro Nasyrov, Founder and CTO at Pharos Production
Dmytro Nasyrov Founder & CTO Let's work together!

Your business results matter

Achieve them with minimized risk through our bespoke innovation capabilities

Your contact details
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Please enter your message
* required

We typically reply within 4 hours. Prefer email? [email protected]

What happens next?

  1. Contact us

    Contact us today to discuss your project. We're ready to review your request promptly and guide you on the best next steps for collaboration

    Same day

  2. NDA

    We're committed to keeping your information confidential, so we'll sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement

    1 day

  3. Plan the Goals

    After we chat about your goals and needs, we'll craft a comprehensive proposal detailing the project scope, team, timeline and budget

    3-5 days

  4. Finalize the Details

    Let's connect on Google Meet to go through the proposal and confirm all the details together!

    1-2 days

  5. Sign the Contract

    As soon as the contract is signed, our dedicated team will jump into action on your project!

    Same day

Our offices

Headquarters in Las Vegas, Nevada. Engineering office in Kyiv, Ukraine.

We also work with clients through dedicated local teams in Las Vegas, New York and San Francisco.

Las Vegas, United States

Headquarters PT
5348 Vegas Dr, Las Vegas, Nevada 89108, United States

Kyiv, Ukraine

Engineering office EET (UTC+2)
44-B Eugene Konovalets Str. Suite 201, Kyiv 01133, Ukraine

Let's work together!

Leave a request and we will contact you as soon as possible

Contact form for Pharos Production. Submit your name, email and message to reach our team directly. Free consultation, no commitment.

Your contact details
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Please enter your message
* required

We typically reply within 4 hours. Prefer email? [email protected]