Pharos Production has partnered with Pleenk to build a secure, scalable payments platform for fast transactions, fraud prevention and seamless integration with digital products. The platform processes payment flows in real time while maintaining high levels of security, transparency and reliability for both businesses and end users. Built on cloud-native infrastructure and an event-driven architecture, Pleenk provides a strong foundation for modern digital payments.
Reviewed by Dr. Dmytro Nasyrov, Founder and CTO
FinTech Development Services
FinTech development at Pharos Production: payments processors, banking-core, lending, RegTech, digital-assets trading.
- 90+ engineers
- 18 industries
- 13+ years in business
FinTech development at Pharos Production: payments processors, banking-core, lending, RegTech, digital-assets trading. Audit-first delivery with PCI-DSS, PSD2, SOC 2. 15+ regulated systems shipped since 2019.
What is FinTech development?
Authoritative citations 5 sources
-
Mordor Intelligence
The global FinTech market is projected to reach $340 billion by 2027
mordorintelligence.com 2024
-
McKinsey and Company
Global Banking Annual Review tracks revenue pools, productivity gaps and fintech disruption across regions
mckinsey.com 2024
-
Bank for International Settlements
CPMI quarterly payment statistics document real-time payment system adoption across G20 economies
bis.org 2024
-
KPMG
Pulse of Fintech tracks global fintech investment volume, deal count and sector distribution semi-annually
kpmg.com 2024
-
World Bank Global Findex
Global Findex Database measures financial inclusion, digital payment adoption and account ownership across 140+ economies
worldbank.org 2021
- Money transmitter operations without client-held licenses (we build the software, you hold the license)
- Cryptocurrency exchanges without KYC/AML and jurisdiction analysis from qualified counsel
- Lending platforms without regulatory review of usury laws and disclosure requirements
- Payment processing where simpler off-the-shelf integration (Stripe, Adyen) would meet client needs
Custom FinTech build vs payments-as-a-service: which is better?
Custom FinTech development gives you control over the regulatory model, unit economics and customer experience, while payments-as-a-service (Stripe Connect, Adyen for Platforms, Unit) ships in days but locks you into vendor pricing and rules. According to the 2024 a16z FinTech research, 63% of growth-stage FinTech founders eventually move at least one core flow off PaaS to capture margin.
| Factor | Custom FinTech build | Payments-as-a-service |
|---|---|---|
| Unit economics | Direct merchant or sponsor-bank rates; margin captured by you | Vendor markup of 1-3% + fixed fees; margin capped |
| Regulatory model | You hold (or partner with) the licensed entity; full compliance ownership | Vendor holds the license; you operate as a sub-merchant |
| Customization | Tailored flows for KYC, dispute handling, multi-currency, jurisdiction logic | Generic templates; limited workflow control |
| Data residency | Your VPC, your region, your retention rules | Vendor regions; subject to vendor data flow |
| Integrations | Native to your core banking, ledger, ERP, fraud and risk stack | Webhooks + vendor SDK; deep integration limited |
| Time to launch | 4-9 months for production-grade build with compliance review | Days for basic flows; weeks for custom rules |
| Cost (year 1) | $40,000-$400,000+ build cost amortized over volume | 0.3-3% of GMV in perpetuity |
| Lock-in risk | Open architecture; portable data; swap rails on contract | Vendor lock-in on rails, pricing and roadmap |
FinTech development at Pharos Production at a glance
- FinTech projects: 15+ production FinTech systems handling real money since 2018 (payments, KYC, banking, crypto rails)
- Compliance posture: PCI DSS architecture, SOC 2 controls, GDPR, aligned with ISO 27001. Sponsor bank integrations supported
- Stack: Elixir, Erlang, Java/Spring, Node.js, PostgreSQL, Kafka, AWS, Kubernetes, Stripe, Plaid, Persona, Sumsub
- Specializations: Payment processing, KYC/AML automation, lending origination, banking core integrations, crypto fiat rails
- Pricing: FinTech MVP from $40,000-$120,000; full payment platform $120,000-$400,000+
- Timeline: Discovery + compliance review 3-5 weeks; build 4-9 months with regulator-aware milestones
- Engagements: Sponsor bank partners (BaaS), payment processors, KYC vendors, crypto exchanges, neobanks
- Honest scope: We recommend Stripe/Plaid/Persona before custom builds when packaged products fit; we decline lending without legal review
Selected FinTech, banking and payments projects we delivered
Our FinTech practice ships regulated production systems, not pilots. A dedicated FinTech engineering team, PCI-DSS-architected infrastructure, SOC 2 controls aligned with ISO 27001 and 15+ FinTech systems handling real money delivered since 2018 across payments, banking-core integrations, lending origination, RegTech and digital-asset rails. We work the full stack: PSD2 strong customer authentication, ISO 20022 messaging, FedNow, SEPA Instant and SWIFT integration patterns, PCI scope reduction through tokenisation, ledger-as-source-of-truth event sourcing, KYC and sanctions automation (Sumsub, Onfido, Chainalysis, TRM Labs) and fraud modeling that combines hard rules with sub-50ms ML scoring at checkout. We do not deploy money-movement code without a documented compliance program, sponsor-bank or licensed-entity sign-off and an external pen test. Every project ships with PCI scope diagrams, SOC 2 evidence pack and a 24/7 incident-response runbook. We routinely advise clients NOT to build payments in-house when a licensed PSP wins on cost, speed-to-market and compliance scope, and we say so before quoting. Below are selected projects from FinTech, banking and payments clients.
-
-
Pharos Production partnered with Nextcheck to replace outdated, manual onboarding with a secure, automated KYC/AML platform. Built on AWS, Kubernetes, Istio, Elixir, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL and NextJS, the platform provides real-time biometric and document verification, risk assessment and compliance reporting. Since 2019, Nextcheck has reduced onboarding time by 60%, cut manual labor by 70% and expanded to support thousands of checks at once. Today, it powers global banks, fintechs and crypto firms with a cloud-native, regulation-ready, growth-oriented compliance platform.
-
Pharos Production has partnered with Kimlic to develop a blockchain-based Know Your Customer (KYC) and digital identity platform. This platform ensures that user verification is secure, reusable and privacy-preserving across Web3 and fintech ecosystems. Users can verify their identity once and then securely share proof with multiple services without exposing sensitive personal information. Built on cloud-native infrastructure and equipped with real-time data pipelines, Kimlic provides compliant identity verification at scale while allowing users to retain control over their data.
About Founder and CTO
Founder and CTO Pharos Production
I design and build reliable software solutions – from lightweight apps to high-load distributed systems and blockchain platforms.
PhD in Artificial Intelligence, MSc in Computer Science (with honors), MSc in Electronics & Precision Mechanics.
-
13 years in architecture of great software solutions tailored to customer needs for startups and enterprises
-
23 years of practical enterprise customized software production experience
-
Lecturer at the National Kyiv Polytechnic University
-
Doctor of Philosophy in Artificial Intelligence
-
Master’s degree in Computer Science, completed with excellence
-
Master’s degree in Electronics and precision mechanics engineering
Proven Results
Kimlic. Blockchain-based KYC
Lifted onboarding completion from 62 to 89 percent and scaled verification volume from 20k to 140k flows per month. Measured…
Pleenk. Secure Payments Platform
Reduced payment authorization p95 latency from 820ms to 180ms and cut KYC decision time from 45s to 4.2s. Measured against…
Nextcheck, the KYC Platform
Automated KYC verification for 5,000+ documents daily with 99.8% accuracy
Pharos Compliance-First Pipeline
The Pharos Compliance-First Pipeline is our four-step delivery cycle for production FinTech software: Compliance Discovery, Threat and Fraud Modeling, Regulated Build and Audit and Production Hardening.
-
1
Compliance Discovery
2-4 weeksmaps the regulatory perimeter before code: PCI-DSS scope, PSD2 SCA obligations, KYC/AML and sanctions-screening requirements, data-residency rules under GDPR or CCPA, and licensing posture (sponsor bank, EMI, money transmitter, MiCA)
Artifacts:- regulatory-scope memo
- data-flow diagram
- decline-or-proceed gate
-
2
Threat and Fraud Modeling
1-2 weeksenumerates attack surfaces against the OWASP Top 10 and the financial-services taxonomy: card fraud, account takeover, synthetic identity, authorized push-payment fraud, internal abuse, sanctions evasion
Artifacts:- threat model
- fraud-control matrix
- sanctions-screening rule set
-
3
Regulated Build
8-16 weeksships the platform under PCI-DSS architectural rules with tokenisation to minimise cardholder-data scope, ledger-as-source-of-truth event sourcing, KYC and sanctions integrations (Sumsub, Onfido, Chainalysis, TRM Labs) and SOC 2 controls baked in from day one
Artifacts:- PCI scope diagram
- control matrix
- KYC and AML integration runbook
-
4
Audit and Production Hardening
3-6 weekscoordinates external penetration test, SOC 2 readiness review with the client auditor, multi-region failover drill and 24/7 incident-response runbook tied to FFIEC examination guidance
Artifacts:- pen-test report
- SOC 2 evidence pack
- incident-response playbook
- monitoring dashboard
The pipeline is named because moving real money is irreversible - we re-enter Compliance Discovery and Hardening on every new rail, jurisdiction or sponsor-bank partner across the engagement lifetime.
-
Phase 01 / 04 Paid Discovery
2-4 weeks- Technical validation
- Architecture proposal
- Scope refined estimate
-
Phase 02 / 04 Iterative Build
2-week sprints- Working demos every sprint
- CTO review at milestones
- ADRs documented
-
Phase 03 / 04 Production Readiness
- Monitoring and alerting
- Security audit Pen test
- Runbooks and rollback
-
Phase 04 / 04 Support
Ongoing- Security patches
- Performance tuning
- 4h SLA response
Pharos Verified Delivery applied to 70+ production applications since 2013
Real client transformations
Anonymized before/after snapshots from production projects. Metrics measured against client-reported pre-engagement baselines.
Manual reconciliation of 12,000 daily transactions across 4 payment providers. 3 full-time analysts. 18-hour delay between transaction and matched status.
Automated reconciliation in under 2 minutes. Analysts reassigned to exceptions review. Zero unreconciled balances across 12 months in production.
We built a provider-agnostic reconciliation engine with a shared ledger format, deterministic matching rules and an exceptions queue for the 0.3% of transactions that need human review. The ledger became the system of record for all four providers.
Manual KYC review averaged 48 hours per applicant. 22% drop-off during the wait. Compliance team backed up.
Automated KYC pipeline with Sumsub integration, sanctions screening and risk-tier routing. 92% of applicants approved in under 5 minutes. Drop-off rate down to 7%. Compliance team handles only edge cases.
Low-risk applicants auto-approve on the spot; medium-risk go to a 15-minute enhanced review flow; high-risk and PEP matches hit the compliance queue. Every decision is auditable with a full document and rule trail for regulators.
Rules-based fraud detection caught 41% of fraud attempts. Each rule update required 2-3 weeks of engineering work. Fraud loss rate 0.8%.
Custom ML model trained on transaction patterns. Caught 87% of fraud attempts with 0.4% false positive rate. Continuous retraining monthly. Fraud loss rate dropped to 0.12%.
Features derived from velocity, graph relationships and device fingerprints; a gradient boosting model serves predictions in sub-50ms at checkout. Hard rules still handle sanction lists and hard blocks; the ML tier handles grey-area scoring.
Client names anonymized under NDA. Full case studies at /cases/.
When custom FinTech is not the answer
We decline roughly 30% of RFPs we receive. Forcing a bad fit costs both sides 3-6 months and damages outcomes. Here is how we think about scope:
- Standard payment acceptance where Stripe Checkout would work in 2 days
- Simple lending where existing loan origination platforms (LendingPad, Encompass) handle 90% of needs
- Crypto products without legal counsel on jurisdiction analysis
- Banking-as-a-service partnerships when buying access from a sponsor bank is faster than building
- Compliance projects without dedicated legal review budget
Not every FinTech idea needs custom development. We have recommended Stripe over custom payment processors, Plaid over custom bank integrations and Persona over custom KYC. Custom FinTech is the right call when you need unique workflows, regulatory configurations or competitive differentiation that packaged products cannot provide.
Read before you commit
Vendor evaluation guide covering compliance experience, payment processing depth, banking API integration, security architecture and red flags specific to financial software development.
- Pharos software audits and SOC 2 readiness work do not replace external attestation. Formal SOC 2 reports are issued by AICPA-licensed CPA firms and PCI-DSS Reports on Compliance are issued by PCI Security Standards Council Qualified Security Assessors. We prepare evidence and design controls; the certificate itself comes from the accredited auditor.
- Financial software is regulated software. Banking, money transmission, EMI, broker-dealer and crypto-asset activity require jurisdiction-specific licensing under regimes such as US state money-transmitter laws, EU PSD2 and the EU MiCA framework. Pharos is not a law firm. Clients must obtain qualified regulatory counsel before launch in any target jurisdiction.
- Cross-border money movement triggers AML, CTF and sanctions-screening obligations including the FATF Travel Rule for transfers above jurisdiction-set thresholds and screening against the US OFAC sanctions list and equivalent EU and UK lists. We integrate KYC and sanctions providers (Sumsub, Onfido, Chainalysis, TRM Labs) on client direction; the underlying compliance program is the licensed entity's legal responsibility.
- Data-localisation and privacy obligations vary by jurisdiction. GDPR, CCPA, UK DPA, Brazilian LGPD and sector rules (PSD2 SCA, GLBA) constrain how customer and transaction data are stored, transferred and retained. Architecture decisions on region, tokenisation and retention must be made before code ships, not retrofitted after audit.
- Production payments and banking software requires multi-region failover, real-time fraud monitoring and 24/7 incident response. Mainnet outages translate directly into stuck funds, regulator notifications and customer escalation. Pharos requires documented runbooks, paging rotation and tested failover as default architecture for any FinTech engagement that moves real money.
Reviews
Independent reviews from Clutch, GoodFirms and Google - verified client feedback on our software projects
Based on 10 verified client reviews
Platforms We Work With
Trusted by Coinbase, Consensys, Core Scientific, MicroStrategy, Gate.io and 10+ more Web3 and enterprise platforms
16+ partnersOur 16 technology partners include:
- Consensys
- Gate Io
- Coinbase
- Ludo
- Core Scientific
- Debut Infotech
- Axoni
- Alchemy
- Starkware
- Mara Holdings
- Microstrategy
- Nubank
- Okx
- Uniswap
- Riot
- Leeway Hertz
-
Consensys
-
Gate Io
-
Coinbase
-
Ludo
-
Core Scientific
-
Debut Infotech
-
Axoni
-
Alchemy
-
Starkware
-
Mara Holdings
-
Microstrategy
-
Nubank
-
Okx
-
Uniswap
-
Riot
-
Leeway Hertz
Partnerships & Awards
Recognized on Clutch, GoodFirms and The Manifest for software engineering excellence
Reviewed by Dmytro Nasyrov
Founder and CTO
23+ years in custom software development. Led 70+ projects across FinTech, healthcare, Web3 and enterprise. aligned with ISO 27001 team.
Choose your cooperation model
Core software architecture, initial UI/UX, working prototype in 3 months
Software architecture, UI/UX, customized software development, manual and automated testing, cloud deployment
Comprehensive software architecture and documentation, UI/UX design layouts, UI kit, clickable prototypes, cloud deployment, continuous integration, as well as automated monitoring and notifications.
Prices vary based on project scope, complexity, timeline and requirements. Contact us for a personalized estimate.
Or select the appropriate interaction model
Request staff augmentation
Need extra hands on your software project? Our developers can jump in at any stage – from architecture to auditing – and integrate seamlessly with your team to fill any technical gaps.
Hire dedicated experts
Whether you’re building from scratch or scaling fast, our engineers are ready to step in. You stay in control, and we handle the code.
Outsource your project
From first line to final audit, we handle the entire development process. We will deliver secure, production-ready software, while you can focus on your business.
| Model | Best for | Team setup | Budget range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staff Augmentation | Existing teams needing extra engineers at any project stage | 1-2 weeks | From $5,000/month |
| Dedicated Team Popular | Long-term projects requiring full ownership and control | 2-4 weeks | From $15,000/month |
| Project Outsourcing | Full-cycle development from idea to production launch | 1-2 weeks | $10,000-$80,000+ |
Technologies, tools and frameworks we use
Our engineers work with 187+ technologies across blockchain, backend, frontend, mobile and DevOps - chosen for production reliability and performance.
AI and Machine Learning
LLM Providers 8
AI Frameworks 15
Vector Databases 7
MLOps and Infrastructure 11
AI Agent Tools 4
Blockchains
Private and Public Blockchains 33
Cloud Blockchain Solutions 4
DevOps
DevOps Tools 15
Clouds
Clouds 6
Databases
Databases 15
Brokers
Event and Message Brokers 7
Tests
Test Automation Tools 6
UI/UX
UI/UX Design Tools 12
An approach to the development cycle
-
Team Assembly
Our company starts and assembles an entire project specialists with the perfect blend of skills and experience to start the work.
-
MVP
We’ll design, build, and launch your MVP, ensuring it meets the core requirements of your software solution.
-
Production
We’ll create a complete software solution that is custom-made to meet your exact specifications.
-
Ongoing
Continuous Support
Our company will be right there with you, keeping your software solution running smoothly, fixing issues, and rolling out updates.
Frequently asked questions about FinTech development
Type to filter questions and answers. Use Topic to narrow the list.
Showing all 10
No matches
Try a different keyword, change the topic, or clear filters
-
No. Pharos Production builds the software; the client (or a sponsor bank partner) holds the regulatory license. We are happy to integrate with your sponsor bank or BaaS provider (Synapse, Treasury Prime, Increase, Column, Bond) and design the compliance program with your legal counsel, but we do not hold money transmitter, banking or broker-dealer licenses ourselves.
-
A production payments MVP typically takes 4-6 months: 2-4 weeks discovery and compliance review, 8-12 weeks build (KYC, ledger, payment rails, dispute handling, reporting), 4-8 weeks integration testing with your sponsor bank or processor and regulator-aware UAT. Pharos has shipped 15+ FinTech systems handling real money since 2018.
-
Pharos infrastructure is PCI DSS architected, SOC 2 controls in place and aligned with ISO 27001, with GDPR processing roles documented. We minimize PCI scope using tokenization (Stripe, Spreedly) wherever possible and design data flows so cardholder data never enters client logs or backups. We document data flow diagrams, retention rules and incident response plans for your auditor. See our State of FinTech Compliance Cost 2026 for detailed cost breakdown across regulatory frameworks.
-
Use packaged services when they fit your model: Stripe for card-present and SaaS billing, Plaid for bank linking, Persona/Sumsub for KYC. Build custom when you need: direct sponsor-bank pricing at scale, jurisdictional compliance (PSD2, FFIEC, MiCA), proprietary risk models, multi-rail orchestration (cards + ACH + crypto + wire) or unit economics that vendor markups make impossible.
-
Yes. We integrate with FIS, Fiserv, Jack Henry, nCino, Mambu and modern core banking platforms (Thought Machine, 10x Banking) via SOAP, REST and event-driven middleware.
We build the abstraction layer so your product code stays decoupled from the core, which means your core upgrade does not break your customer-facing app.
-
For crypto fiat rails we integrate KYC/AML providers (Sumsub, Onfido, Persona, Jumio) for identity verification, Chainalysis or TRM Labs for blockchain analytics, and design the off-ramp/on-ramp flows around the client’s licensed sponsor or money transmitter. Compliance program design is the client’s responsibility; we build the software to enforce it.
-
Backend: Elixir/Phoenix and Java/Spring for high-throughput payment paths; Node.js or Python for orchestration. Storage: PostgreSQL for ledger, Kafka for event sourcing, ClickHouse for analytics.
Cloud: AWS with VPC isolation, KMS for key management, CloudHSM for PCI-scoped operations. Frontend: React/Next.js with strict design tokens. Observability: Datadog or Grafana stack with PII redaction.
-
We decline when: payment processing could be solved by a Stripe/Adyen integration alone; lending products lack legal counsel on usury and disclosure rules; crypto products lack jurisdictional analysis from qualified counsel; or the team has no plan to operate the compliance program post-launch. Forcing a regulated build without these foundations costs everyone time and reputation.
-
Jurisdiction is a product decision, not a legal afterthought. Common patterns: EU passporting via Lithuania or Ireland for EMI/PI licenses; UK FCA for retail-facing payments and lending; Singapore MAS for APAC reach with PSP/MPI license; US state-by-state MSB plus federal layer for crypto.
We start by mapping your customer geography, transaction profile and capital plan, then work with your counsel to pick a primary plus expansion path. Wrong jurisdiction picks add 6-12 months to timeline and force re-architecture of KYC, sanctions screening and reporting flows.
-
A ledger is append-only, immutable and timestamped. A relational ledger built on PostgreSQL or a purpose-built event store gives you reproducible balance reconstruction at any point in time, audit trails that cannot be silently mutated and direct alignment with PCAOB and SOC 2 audit evidence requirements.
We use double-entry semantics with explicit debit and credit legs, idempotency keys on every posting and async projection into denormalized read models. This pattern survives regulator review better than a mutable balances table that lost write history.
Sources and references
Payment standards, banking regulations and compliance frameworks referenced throughout this FinTech guide.
- PCI Security Standards Council pcisecuritystandards.org
- AICPA SOC 2 aicpa-cima.com
- FFIEC Examination Handbook ffiec.gov
- EBA PSD2 Regulation europa.eu
- FATF Travel Rule fatf-gafi.org
- ISO 20022 iso20022.org
- OWASP Top 10 owasp.org
Published record
Published Pharos research
Technical articles, comparison guides and methodology deep-dives we write from our own delivery experience.
Payments and banking project TCO calculator
Estimate dev cost, compliance cost, Year-1 TCO and time-to-launch for FinTech projects spanning payments, banking-core, lending, RegTech, insurance, digital-assets trading, FX treasury and wallet apps. Directional only.
Last reviewed . Compliance ranges reflect PCI Security Standards Council, AICPA SOC 2 cost surveys, McKinsey FinTech operations report and public pricing posts from Sumsub, Chainalysis and TRM Labs. See disclaimer below.
Your business results matter
Achieve them with minimized risk through our bespoke innovation capabilities
What happens next?
-
Contact us
Contact us today to discuss your project. We’re ready to review your request promptly and guide you on the best next steps for collaboration
Same day -
NDA
We’re committed to keeping your information confidential, so we’ll sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement
1 day -
Plan the Goals
After we chat about your goals and needs, we’ll craft a comprehensive proposal detailing the project scope, team, timeline and budget
3-5 days -
Finalize the Details
Let’s connect on Google Meet to go through the proposal and confirm all the details together!
1-2 days -
Sign the Contract
As soon as the contract is signed, our dedicated team will jump into action on your project!
Same day
Our offices
Headquarters in Las Vegas, Nevada. Engineering office in Kyiv, Ukraine.