Skip to content

Reviewed by

IT Consulting

Pharos Production provides IT Consulting services that help businesses make technology decisions with confidence.

  • 90+ engineers
  • 18 industries
  • 13+ years in business

Your business results matter

Achieve them with minimized risk through our bespoke innovation capabilities

Your contact details
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Please enter your message
* required

We typically reply within 1 business day

Pharos Production provides IT Consulting services that help businesses make technology decisions with confidence. Our consultants bring 12+ years of hands-on engineering experience - we do not just advise, we build. Our consulting engagements cover technology stack selection, architecture review, cloud strategy, security assessment, AI readiness evaluation, development process optimization and vendor evaluation. We help CTOs and engineering leaders answer critical questions: should we build or buy? Which cloud provider fits our compliance requirements? Is our architecture ready to scale 10x? How do we adopt AI without disrupting current operations? Every consulting engagement produces actionable deliverables - architecture diagrams, technology roadmaps, cost projections and implementation plans with clear timelines. We offer consulting as a standalone service or as the first phase of a development engagement. aligned with ISO 27001.

Reviewed and updated
Last reviewed by Dmytro Nasyrov, Founder and CTO. Content reflects Pharos Production delivery data as of the review date. Editorial policy.

What is IT consulting?

Software consulting covers the advisory, planning and embedded engineering services that help organizations make better technical decisions and execute them. It includes IT consulting (technology selection, architecture review, vendor evaluation), staff augmentation (individual senior engineers joining the client team), dedicated team engagements, fractional CTO services, digital transformation programs and technical due diligence. We work with founders evaluating technical decisions, mid-market CTOs needing senior expertise without full-time hires and enterprises running transformation programs.
Authoritative citations 5 sources
  1. Statista IT consulting and implementation services revenue worldwide forecast through 2026 statista.com 2024
  2. McKinsey Digital Top trends in tech tracks generative AI, applied AI, future of mobility, advanced connectivity and other tech-driven shifts mckinsey.com 2024
  3. Gartner Hype Cycle methodology maps technology maturity, adoption velocity and time-to-plateau across emerging tech categories gartner.com 2024
  4. ISO and IEC ISO/IEC 25010 software product quality model defines characteristics for fitness-for-purpose evaluation iso25000.com 2023
  5. The Open Group TOGAF Standard provides enterprise architecture method, content framework and governance approach for IT transformation opengroup.org 2024
What we do not do:
  • Pure strategy consulting without engineering execution capability
  • Body-shop staff augmentation without quality screening
  • Engagements without clear success criteria and exit conditions
  • Long-term retainers without scope review every quarter

Independent technical consulting vs in-house architect: which is better?

Independent consulting brings outside perspective, cross-industry pattern recognition and fresh eyes on hidden assumptions, while an in-house architect gives you continuous context and ownership of long-term decisions. According to a 2024 McKinsey survey, 71% of growth-stage CTOs use external advisors at major architecture decision points specifically to challenge internal consensus.

Factor Independent consulting In-house architect only
Outside perspective Cross-industry patterns; fresh eyes on internal assumptions Familiar with the system; harder to challenge own design
Speed of insight 2-4 weeks for an architecture review with written recommendation Weeks to months as decisions filter through team consensus
Specialization Senior engineers across AI, blockchain, FinTech, infra; matched to your decision Generalist coverage; deep specialization is rare in single hire
Cost flexibility Pay only for the decision you need (a few weeks of engagement) $250K-$500K loaded cost per senior architect FTE
Defensible report Written report you can show investors, board, regulators Internal Slack threads; harder to share externally
Continuity Engagement ends; knowledge transfer to your team Continuous ownership of long-term decisions
Bias control No internal politics; can recommend approaches that challenge incumbents Subject to internal politics, vendor relationships, sunk cost bias
Best combination Use for major decisions, due diligence, second opinions Use for day-to-day execution and ongoing system health

Software consulting at Pharos Production at a glance

  • Engagements: Architecture reviews, fractional CTO, staff augmentation, technical due diligence, MVP validation
  • Decision focus: Build vs buy, rewrite vs incremental, microservices vs monolith, cloud vendor choice, AI/blockchain vendor selection
  • Team composition: Senior engineers and architects with 10-20+ years; founder-CTO Dmytro Nasyrov leads complex engagements
  • Pricing: Architecture review from $8,000-$25,000; fractional CTO from $12,000/month; staff augmentation by senior rate
  • Timeline: Architecture review 2-4 weeks; fractional CTO month-to-month; due diligence 1-3 weeks
  • Independence: We recommend off-the-shelf when it fits and walk away from work that does not match scope
  • Output: Written report with options, trade-offs, recommendation, implementation roadmap and risk register
  • Honest scope: We recommend the lightest possible engagement; we have closed engagements with "you already know what to do" reports

Selected IT consulting engagements we delivered

Our consulting practice tells clients what they need to hear, not what they want to hear. 12+ years of cross-domain pattern recognition across blockchain, FinTech, AI, SaaS and mobile - the same engineers who ship production systems lead the engagements, not consultants playing engineer. Founder-CTO Dmytro Nasyrov (PhD, AI) personally leads complex architecture reviews and technical due-diligence. We are method-focused: every engagement ends in a structured tech audit scored against ISO/IEC 25010, a written buy-vs-build matrix with weighted criteria, an IEEE-style spec or RFC and a transition runbook the client engineering team owns after handoff. Slide decks are an output, never the deliverable. We routinely advise clients to NOT engage consulting when their team can ship a 2-week spike that answers the question, and we say so before quoting. Read our advisory limits and decision considerations before signing - we publish them so the engagement contract starts with shared expectations. Below are selected consulting engagements - architecture reviews, fractional CTO retainers and technical due-diligence - drawn from our delivered work across 14 industries.

  • Taxi Aggregator App - application interface, screen 1
    Taxi Aggregator App - application interface, screen 2
    Social

    Taxi Aggregator App

    Pharos Production collaborated with a taxi aggregator platform to develop a high-load ride-hailing application that connects passengers and drivers in real time. This platform consolidates various fleets and independent drivers into a single system, ensuring quick ride matching, live tracking and transparent pricing. Built on a cloud-native infrastructure, the solution offers low-latency interactions, reliable trip processing and scalability for operations at the city and regional levels.

  • Sagas. Time-lapse Social Network - application interface, screen 1
    Sagas. Time-lapse Social Network - application interface, screen 2
    Sagas. Time-lapse Social Network - application interface, screen 3
    Sagas. Time-lapse Social Network - application interface, screen 4
    Sagas. Time-lapse Social Network - application interface, screen 5
    Sagas. Time-lapse Social Network - application interface, screen 6
    Social

    Sagas. Time-lapse Social Network

    Pharos Production has partnered with Sagas to create a location-aware social platform that enables users to capture, publish, and explore geo-located timelapses over time. This system combines real-time data ingestion, large-scale media processing, and map-centric discovery to transform physical locations into dynamic digital stories. Leveraging cloud-native infrastructure and event-driven architecture, Sagas allows users to document urban changes, natural evolution, and personal moments tied to specific places. The result is a scalable social network where time and location are central to content discovery.

  • PumpTap crypto wallet multi-chain asset dashboard
    PumpTap Crypto Wallet - application interface, screen 2
    PumpTap Crypto Wallet - application interface, screen 3
    Web3 & Blockchain

    PumpTap Crypto Wallet

    Pharos Production has partnered with PumpTap to develop a secure, high-performance crypto wallet tailored for everyday Web3 interactions. PumpTap lets users store, send and manage digital assets across multiple blockchains through a simple, intuitive interface. Built on a scalable, event-driven architecture, the wallet delivers real-time transaction updates, robust security and seamless integration with decentralized applications.

  • Pulse. Social Network With Prizes - application interface, screen 1
    Pulse. Social Network With Prizes - application interface, screen 2
    Pulse Social Network - Community commerce platform by Pharos Production
    Social

    Pulse. Social Network With Prizes

    Pharos Production has partnered with Pulse to create a community-driven social network that connects users with local stores through challenges, engagement activities, and real-world prizes. This platform transforms everyday local interactions into interactive experiences, enabling users to earn rewards from participating merchants. Built on a scalable, event-driven architecture, Pulse facilitates real-time interactions between users and businesses and supports rapid growth across cities and regions.

  • Pro Gambling. Sports Forecasting Platform - application interface, screen 1
    Pro Gambling. Sports Forecasting Platform - application interface, screen 2
    Casino & Sportsbook

    Pro Gambling. Sports Forecasting Platform

    Pharos Production partnered with Pro Gambling to build a high-load sports forecasting platform focused on data-driven predictions, real-time analytics and scalable delivery of betting insights. The platform aggregates large volumes of sports data, odds movements and historical statistics to generate forecasts that help users make informed betting decisions. Built on a cloud-native, event-driven architecture, Pro Gambling delivers fast updates, transparent analytics and consistent performance during peak sports events.

  • Pleenk. Secure Payments Platform - application interface, screen 1
    Pleenk. Secure Payments Platform - application interface, screen 2
    Pleenk. Secure Payments Platform - application interface, screen 3
    Banking

    Pleenk. Secure Payments Platform

    Pharos Production has partnered with Pleenk to build a secure, scalable payments platform for fast transactions, fraud prevention and seamless integration with digital products. The platform processes payment flows in real time while maintaining high levels of security, transparency and reliability for both businesses and end users. Built on cloud-native infrastructure and an event-driven architecture, Pleenk provides a strong foundation for modern digital payments.

  • NoMoreBets. Rapid Bets Platform. - application interface, screen 1
    NoMoreBets. Rapid Bets Platform. - application interface, screen 2
    NoMoreBets. Rapid Bets Platform. - application interface, screen 3
    NoMoreBets. Rapid Bets Platform. - application interface, screen 4
    NoMoreBets. Rapid Bets Platform. - application interface, screen 5
    Casino & Sportsbook

    NoMoreBets. Rapid Bets Platform.

    Pharos Production partnered with NoMoreBets to develop a worldwide one-tap live betting platform focused on speed and scalability. The system handles real-time odds and instant bets effortlessly. The result is a smooth, engaging betting experience that increased player retention, reduced drop-offs during live matches, and positioned NoMoreBets for global growth since 2022.

  • Nextcheck, the KYC Platform - application interface, screen 1
    Nextcheck, the KYC Platform - application interface, screen 2
    Nextcheck, the KYC Platform - application interface, screen 3
    Nextcheck, the KYC Platform - application interface, screen 4
    Banking

    Nextcheck, the KYC Platform

    Pharos Production partnered with Nextcheck to replace outdated, manual onboarding with a secure, automated KYC/AML platform. Built on AWS, Kubernetes, Istio, Elixir, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL and NextJS, the platform provides real-time biometric and document verification, risk assessment and compliance reporting. Since 2019, Nextcheck has reduced onboarding time by 60%, cut manual labor by 70% and expanded to support thousands of checks at once. Today, it powers global banks, fintechs and crypto firms with a cloud-native, regulation-ready, growth-oriented compliance platform.

About Founder and CTO

Dmytro Nasyrov

Dmytro Nasyrov

Founder and CTO Pharos Production

Ask the founder a question

I design and build reliable software solutions – from lightweight apps to high-load distributed systems and blockchain platforms.

PhD in Artificial Intelligence, MSc in Computer Science (with honors), MSc in Electronics & Precision Mechanics.

  • 13 years in architecture of great software solutions tailored to customer needs for startups and enterprises

  • 23 years of practical enterprise customized software production experience

  • Lecturer at the National Kyiv Polytechnic University

  • Doctor of Philosophy in Artificial Intelligence

  • Master’s degree in Computer Science, completed with excellence

  • Master’s degree in Electronics and precision mechanics engineering

Pharos Production - Describe your idea & get a quote in 48h! Get an estimate for the costs, timeline & the team layout needed for your project Get a project estimate.

Pharos Strategy-to-Spec Loop

The Pharos Strategy-to-Spec Loop is our four-step advisory cycle for IT consulting engagements: Discovery and Tech Audit, Strategic Decision, Specification and Architecture and Handoff or Build.

  1. 1

    Discovery and Tech Audit

    1-2 weeks

    maps the existing system, scores technical debt against ISO/IEC 25010 quality characteristics (functional suitability, performance, security, maintainability, reliability) and produces a written risk register with severity and remediation cost estimates

    Artifacts:
    • tech-audit memo
    • debt-scored risk register
    • dependency map
  2. 2

    Strategic Decision

    1-2 weeks

    scores the actual decision the client is paying us to make - buy vs build, rewrite vs incremental, monolith vs microservices, vendor A vs vendor B - using a structured matrix with weighted criteria and a written decision recommendation

    Artifacts:
    • decision matrix
    • vendor-RFP scoring sheet
    • capacity assessment
  3. 3

    Specification and Architecture

    2-4 weeks

    ships an IEEE 29148-style spec or RFC document with integration boundaries, success metrics, sequence diagrams and an explicit non-goals section so scope cannot drift

    Artifacts:
    • spec doc
    • RFC
    • architecture diagrams aligned with <a href="https://www
  4. 4

    Handoff or Build

    1-2 weeks for handoff, 4-12 weeks if build follows

    delivers either a transition runbook to the client engineering team or a build cutover with named owners, on-call rotation and a 30-day overlap

    Artifacts:
    • transition runbook
    • ADR set
    • knowledge-transfer log

The loop re-enters Discovery on each new decision gate across the engagement lifetime - architecture review, vendor change, scaling event or M&A trigger.

Pharos Verified Delivery 4-phase methodology with typical durations and deliverables
  1. Phase 01 / 04

    Paid Discovery

    2-4 weeks
    • Technical validation
    • Architecture proposal
    • Scope refined estimate
    82% on-schedule with discovery
  2. Phase 02 / 04

    Iterative Build

    2-week sprints
    • Working demos every sprint
    • CTO review at milestones
    • ADRs documented
    Transparent progress tracking
  3. Phase 03 / 04

    Production Readiness

    • Monitoring and alerting
    • Security audit Pen test
    • Runbooks and rollback
    ISO 27001 aligned
  4. Phase 04 / 04

    Support

    Ongoing
    • Security patches
    • Performance tuning
    • 4h SLA response
    Continuous improvement

Pharos Verified Delivery applied to 70+ production applications since 2013

Real client transformations

Anonymized before/after snapshots from production projects. Metrics measured against client-reported pre-engagement baselines.

Architecture review Q2 2024 · Series-B SaaS, US
Before

Client SaaS platform was approaching scale limits. Internal team disagreed on architecture path. Investor pressure to ship next features.

After

Pharos architecture review delivered in 3 weeks. Recommended pragmatic incremental path over rewrite. Saved 9 months and $1.2M vs the rewrite proposal. Platform now handles 10x prior load.

We profiled the hot paths, identified a single write-amplification bottleneck in the ledger and shipped a targeted fix with a partitioning strategy that bought 18 months of headroom. The proposed rewrite would have delivered the same throughput in 12 months with rollout risk.

Fractional CTO Q3 2024-Q1 2025 · Series-A startup, EU
Before

Series A startup needed CTO-level oversight but could not afford a full-time hire ($300K+). Founder was making technical decisions outside their expertise.

After

Pharos fractional CTO at 20 hours per week for 9 months. Hired full-time CTO from network. Avoided 2 hiring mistakes that would have cost the company. Platform stability improved measurably.

We took architecture ownership, ran weekly engineering reviews with the team, chaired the hiring loop for the permanent CTO hire and handed off with a 30-day overlap. The founder kept optionality and did not need to commit to a $300K+ hire before product-market fit.

Staff augmentation Q1 2025 · FinTech scale-up, US
Before

Client team needed 3 senior engineers for 6 months on a critical project. Internal hiring would take 4-6 months minimum.

After

Pharos engineers embedded in client team within 1 week. Project shipped 2 months ahead of schedule. Knowledge transfer to client engineers during the engagement. Client retained 1 engineer post-engagement as full-time hire.

Every Pharos engineer paired with a client engineer from day one and documented every architectural decision in ADRs the client owns after handoff. Knowledge transfer was built into the delivery model, not bolted on at the end.

Client names anonymized under NDA. Full case studies at /cases/.

When consulting is not the answer

We decline roughly 30% of RFPs we receive. Forcing a bad fit costs both sides 3-6 months and damages outcomes. Here is how we think about scope:

Projects we decline
  • Decisions you can make in a 2-hour meeting with your existing team
  • Engagements where you want validation rather than honest assessment
  • Long retainers without clear deliverables and exit criteria
  • Strategy work without execution follow-through plan
We recommend the lightest possible engagement

Not every problem needs a consulting engagement. Sometimes a 1-hour expert call is enough. Sometimes the answer is "you already know what to do, do it." We start by understanding the actual decision and recommend the smallest engagement that fits - because long engagements without scope are how consulting goes bad.

Read before you commit

Vendor Evaluation Guides →

Founder-grade guides on choosing development partners across AI, blockchain and FinTech. Use these as decision frameworks even if Pharos is not the chosen vendor.

How we count our stats
Consulting metrics counted: engagement counts reflect distinct paying clients across consulting service lines. Staff augmentation hours reflect billable engineer-hours delivered. Fractional CTO engagements counted as distinct client contracts. Last reviewed: . Corrections? Email [email protected] - see our Editorial policy for review cadence.
Important
Pharos Production provides software consulting and engineering advisory services. We are not legal, financial or accounting advisors. Recommendations reflect our experience and the information shared during the engagement. Implementation outcomes depend on client execution and operational context.
Advisory limits and decision considerations
  • Buy-vs-build recommendations are scenario-dependent. We score against client-specific cost, capacity and capability constraints; outcomes vary materially with org context, hiring market and existing tech stack. We re-score on every meaningful constraint change.
  • Vendor RFP scoring and decision matrices are structured inputs to a decision, not a substitute for executive judgement. The final call on strategic vendor commitments belongs to the client leadership team. We document our recommendation; the client owns the decision.
  • Technology-trend recommendations operate on 12-24 month windows. Reports referencing McKinsey Technology Trends or Gartner Hype Cycle phases are inputs - not predictions. Any horizon beyond 24 months requires re-validation.
  • Cost and TCO estimates carry inherent uncertainty. Multi-year forecasts (build cost, run cost, migration cost, vendor switching cost) typically carry +/- 30-50% confidence intervals. We disclose the assumptions and the range; we do not present point estimates as guarantees.
  • Tech-audit findings can surface compliance, IP-licence, security or contractual liability issues that have legal weight. Pharos is not a law firm. Clients must obtain qualified legal counsel before acting on findings that touch licensing terms, regulatory exposure or fiduciary duty.

Reviews

Independent reviews from Clutch, GoodFirms and Google - verified client feedback on our software projects

Based on 11 verified client reviews

5 out of 5 stars
Information Technology

Strong blockchain security expertise improved system integrity.

Imran Mohiuddin
5 out of 5 stars
Healthcare

Pharos Production has been instrumental in our digital transformation, delivering a secure, interoperable healthcare platform that aligns with our long-term vision. Their exceptional ability to harmonize regulatory compliance, system scalability and user experience has made our collaboration not only efficient but also a fantastic strategic partnership. We’re truly grateful!

Susan Walker
5 out of 5 stars
Web3 & Blockchain

Delivered responsive mobile app with improved onboarding and retention.

Jake Catt
5 out of 5 stars
Software Development

Delivered polished and functional product with strong communication and responsiveness.

Fabio Sebastian Castaneres Romero
5 out of 5 stars
Web3 & Blockchain

Delivered cross-border blockchain hiring solution with strong execution and usability.

Marko Lanza
5 out of 5 stars
Web3 & Blockchain

Delivered blockchain cashback solution with clear communication and usability.

Matteo Martino
5 out of 5 stars
Web3 & Blockchain

Delivered blockchain solution tailored for legal workflows and document verification.

Michele Felmlee
5 out of 5 stars
Software Development

Delivered scalable custom software with strong technical alignment and communication.

Co-founder at Freeplay
5 out of 5 stars
Web3 & Blockchain

Delivered private blockchain with smart contracts and supply chain integration for logistics.

Business Development Manager Air & Sea at FLEJA Transport & Logistics
5 out of 5 stars
AI

Strong domain expertise and agile delivery.

Joshua Hernandez
5 out of 5 stars
Social

Pharos Production Inc.'s dedicated efforts led to a remarkable 95% increase in tracking accuracy for the client. The team used Jira, Trello, and Zoom to communicate and manage the project. Their technical knowledge was a hallmark of their work.

Jose Ramirez

Platforms We Work With

Trusted by Coinbase, Consensys, Core Scientific, MicroStrategy, Gate.io and 10+ more Web3 and enterprise platforms

16+ partners

Our 16 technology partners include:

  • Consensys
  • Gate Io
  • Coinbase
  • Ludo
  • Core Scientific
  • Debut Infotech
  • Axoni
  • Alchemy
  • Starkware
  • Mara Holdings
  • Microstrategy
  • Nubank
  • Okx
  • Uniswap
  • Riot
  • Leeway Hertz
  • Consensys logo Consensys
  • Gate Io logo Gate Io
  • Coinbase logo Coinbase
  • Core Scientific logo Core Scientific
  • Debut Infotech logo Debut Infotech
  • Axoni logo Axoni
  • Alchemy logo Alchemy
  • Starkware logo Starkware
  • Mara Holdings logo Mara Holdings
  • Microstrategy logo Microstrategy
  • Nubank logo Nubank
  • Okx logo Okx
  • Uniswap logo Uniswap
  • Riot logo Riot
  • Leeway Hertz logo Leeway Hertz
Trusted & Certified

Partnerships & Awards

Recognized on Clutch, GoodFirms and The Manifest for software engineering excellence

  • Partner1
  • Partner2
  • Partner3
  • Partner4
  • Partner5
18+ industry awards

Pharos Production - Ready to realize your vision? Embrace outsourcing and remote hiring with our skilled software developers! Build Your Software Today.

Dmytro Nasyrov - Founder and CTO of Pharos Production

Reviewed by Dmytro Nasyrov

Founder and CTO

23+ years in custom software development. Led 70+ projects across FinTech, healthcare, Web3 and enterprise. aligned with ISO 27001 team.

Choose your cooperation model

Discovery
Discovery workshop

Current-state audit, use-case validation and strategic roadmap for your leadership team.

$3,500 - $9,000
Popular choice
Strategy
Strategic engagement

Deep-dive assessment, technology selection, architecture blueprint and phased implementation plan.

$7,000 - $17,000
Transformation
Transformation program

Full advisory retainer covering strategy, delivery oversight, governance and change management.

$19,000 - $50,000+

Prices vary based on project scope, complexity, timeline and requirements. Contact us for a personalized estimate.

Or select the appropriate interaction model

Request staff augmentation

Need extra hands on your software project? Our developers can jump in at any stage – from architecture to auditing – and integrate seamlessly with your team to fill any technical gaps.

Outsource your project

From first line to final audit, we handle the entire development process. We will deliver secure, production-ready software, while you can focus on your business.

Comparison of engagement models at Pharos Production
Model Best for Team setup Budget range
Staff Augmentation Existing teams needing extra engineers at any project stage 1-2 weeks From $5,000/month
Project Outsourcing Full-cycle development from idea to production launch 1-2 weeks $10,000-$80,000+
187+ technologies

Technologies, tools and frameworks we use

Our engineers work with 187+ technologies across blockchain, backend, frontend, mobile and DevOps - chosen for production reliability and performance.

Frameworks

Backend Frameworks 8

Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Erlang OTP
Erlang OTP
NodeJS
NodeJS
Phoenix
Phoenix
NestJS
NestJS
Django
FastAPI
Express.js

Front End Frameworks 8

React
React
Next.JS
Next.JS
Svelte
Svelte
Angular
Angular
Vue.js
Remix
Astro
Nuxt.js

AI and Machine Learning

LLM Providers 8

OpenAI GPT
Anthropic Claude
Google Gemini
Meta Llama
Mistral AI
Cohere
Ollama
xAI Grok

AI Frameworks 15

LangChain
LangGraph
CrewAI
AutoGen
Hugging Face
PyTorch
TensorFlow
scikit-learn
LlamaIndex
Keras
XGBoost
LightGBM
OpenCV
spaCy
ONNX Runtime

Vector Databases 7

Pinecone
Weaviate
Qdrant
Chroma
pgvector
Milvus
FAISS

MLOps and Infrastructure 11

MLflow
Weights & Biases
DVC
Kubeflow
AWS SageMaker
Azure ML
Google Vertex AI
NVIDIA Triton
Airflow
Ray Serve
vLLM

AI Agent Tools 4

OpenAI Agents SDK
Claude MCP
Semantic Kernel
Haystack

Blockchains

Private and Public Blockchains 33

Ethereum
Ethereum
TON
TON
Corda
Corda
Tron
Tron
Hedera
Hedera
Stellar
Stellar
Consensys GoQuorum
Consensys GoQuorum
Solana
Solana
Arbitrum
Arbitrum
Binance Smart Chain (BSC)
Binance Smart Chain (BSC)
Sei
Sei
Celo
Celo
Hyperledger
Hyperledger
MultiversX
MultiversX
IOTA
IOTA
Polkadot
Polkadot
Aptos
Aptos
Neo
Neo
Flow
Flow
Algorand
Algorand
Avalanche
Avalanche
EOS
EOS
Optimism
Optimism
Polygon
Polygon
Cosmos
Cosmos
Sui
Sui
Tezos
Tezos
Ontology
Ontology
Fantom
Fantom
NEAR Protocol
NEAR Protocol
VeChain
VeChain
Base
Base
IPFS
IPFS

Cloud Blockchain Solutions 4

Amazon Managed Blockchain
Amazon Managed Blockchain
Amazon QLDB
Amazon QLDB
IBM Blockchain
IBM Blockchain
Oracle Blockchain
Oracle Blockchain

DevOps

DevOps Tools 15

Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Terraform
Terraform
Docker
Docker
Istio
Istio
Prometheus
Prometheus
Grafana
Grafana
Jenkins
Jenkins
ArgoCD
ArgoCD
Ansible
Ansible
GitHub Actions
GitLab CI
Pulumi
Datadog
New Relic
Vault

Clouds

Clouds 6

Amazon Web Services
Amazon Web Services
Azure
Azure
Google Cloud
Google Cloud
Cloudflare
Vercel
DigitalOcean

Databases

Databases 15

PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL MariaDB
MySQL MariaDB
Redis
Redis
Cassandra
Cassandra
Neo4J
Neo4J
MongoDB
MongoDB
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Solr
Solr
Ignite
Ignite
ClickHouse
TimescaleDB
DynamoDB
Supabase
CockroachDB
ScyllaDB

Brokers

Event and Message Brokers 7

Kafka
Kafka
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Flink
Flink
Apache Pulsar
Amazon SQS
Amazon SNS
NATS

Tests

Test Automation Tools 6

Postman
Postman
Appium
Appium
Cucumber
Cucumber
Selenium
Selenium
JMeter
JMeter
Cypress
Cypress

Programming

UI/UX

UI/UX Design Tools 12

Figma
Figma
Zeplin
Zeplin
InVision
InVision
Sketch
Sketch
Miro
Miro
Marvel
Marvel
Balsamiq
Balsamiq
Photoshop
Photoshop
Illustrator
Illustrator
XD
XD
After Effects
After Effects
Corel Draw
Corel Draw

Pharos Production - 70+ applications delivered over 13 years. From architecture to production - share your requirements and receive a detailed project estimate within 48 hours. Get a project estimate.

An approach to the development cycle

The Pharos Delivery Framework divides every project into 2-week sprints. After each sprint there is a retrospective of the work done, planning for the next sprint, a report of the work done and a plan for the next sprint. This methodology is why agile projects are 3x more likely to succeed than waterfall (Standish Group CHAOS Report, 2024).
  1. Team Assembly

    Our company starts and assembles an entire project specialists with the perfect blend of skills and experience to start the work.

  2. MVP

    We’ll design, build, and launch your MVP, ensuring it meets the core requirements of your software solution.

  3. Production

    We’ll create a complete software solution that is custom-made to meet your exact specifications.

  4. Ongoing

    Continuous Support

    Our company will be right there with you, keeping your software solution running smoothly, fixing issues, and rolling out updates.

Frequently asked questions about IT consulting

Last updated:

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    When you are facing a major decision: rewrite vs refactor, monolith vs microservices, cloud vendor choice, build vs buy on a critical capability, M&A technical due diligence, scaling crisis approaching. The output is a written report with options, trade-offs, a recommendation and an IEEE 29148-style implementation roadmap. Typical engagements are 2-4 weeks and cost $8,000-$25,000.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    A senior engineering leader (typically founder-CTO Dmytro Nasyrov or a 15+ year architect) joins your team part-time, typically 10-20 hours per week, for 3-12 months. Coverage includes architecture decisions, hiring senior engineers, vendor selection, board reporting and crisis response. Pricing starts at $12,000 per month. Used for series A/B startups before they hire a full-time CTO.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    A 1-3 week assessment of a target company’s codebase, architecture, team, processes and technical risk - typically commissioned by investors or acquirers before a deal closes. Output is a confidential report covering: code quality (scored against ISO/IEC 25010 quality characteristics), architecture risk, team strength, security posture, scalability headroom, technical debt and red flags. We have helped close multiple Series A/B and acquisition deals. See our State of Tech Due Diligence 2026 for framework and benchmark metrics from M&A activity.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    Yes, with quality screening: senior engineers from the Pharos team join client teams as embedded contributors. Typical engagements are 3-12 months at senior or staff engineer levels.

    We do NOT operate as a body shop - every engineer is screened for the specific stack, the client interviews the candidate, and we replace anyone who is not delivering within 2 weeks at no charge.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    We do not take referral fees from vendors and we publish vendor evaluation guides openly (see /comparisons/). We recommend Stripe over custom payment processors, Plaid over custom bank integrations, Snowflake over custom data warehouses when those are right - even though we could bill more for the custom build.

    Independence is part of how we run the practice.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    A 1-hour expert call ($500) or a 3-day rapid review ($4,500) for early-stage decisions where a longer engagement would be overkill. We have closed several engagements with “you already know what to do, do it” recommendations.

    Recommending the lightest possible engagement is deliberate; long engagements without scope are how consulting goes bad.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    We decline when: the request is pure strategy without engineering execution capability needed; the client wants validation rather than honest assessment; the engagement has no clear success criteria or exit conditions; or the client wants long-term retainers without quarterly scope review. We also decline engagements where the obvious answer is “use the existing tool” and the client is paying us to confirm a sunk-cost decision.

Sources and references

Quality, architecture and management research referenced throughout this IT consulting guide.

Tech consulting engagement cost calculator

Estimate engagement cost, time-to-deliverable, senior consultant-days and decision artifacts produced for tech audits, RFCs, fractional CTO retainers, M&A due diligence and cloud migration strategies. Directional only.

Last reviewed . Rates reflect Pharos consulting engagement data plus benchmarks from McKinsey Tech Trends, Toptal engineering rate surveys and BCG tech-DD playbooks. See disclaimer below.

Output format

Estimates based on 2024-2026 Pharos consulting engagement data across blockchain, FinTech, AI and SaaS plus public benchmarks from McKinsey Tech Trends, Gartner Hype Cycle methodology, Toptal engineering rate surveys and Boston Consulting Group tech-DD playbooks. Actual scope depends on stakeholder availability, system access and decision complexity. Final pricing requires a discovery call.

Dmytro Nasyrov, Founder and CTO at Pharos Production
Dmytro Nasyrov Founder & CTO Let’s work together!

Your business results matter

Achieve them with minimized risk through our bespoke innovation capabilities

Your contact details
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Please enter your message
* required

We typically reply within 1 business day

What happens next?

  1. Contact us

    Contact us today to discuss your project. We’re ready to review your request promptly and guide you on the best next steps for collaboration

    Same day
  2. NDA

    We’re committed to keeping your information confidential, so we’ll sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement

    1 day
  3. Plan the Goals

    After we chat about your goals and needs, we’ll craft a comprehensive proposal detailing the project scope, team, timeline and budget

    3-5 days
  4. Finalize the Details

    Let’s connect on Google Meet to go through the proposal and confirm all the details together!

    1-2 days
  5. Sign the Contract

    As soon as the contract is signed, our dedicated team will jump into action on your project!

    Same day

Our offices

Headquarters in Las Vegas, Nevada. Engineering office in Kyiv, Ukraine.

Las Vegas, United States

Headquarters PST (UTC-8)
5348 Vegas Dr, Las Vegas, Nevada 89108, United States

Kyiv, Ukraine

Engineering office EET (UTC+2)
44-B Eugene Konovalets Str. Suite 201, Kyiv 01133, Ukraine