Reviewed by

Digital Product Management

Pharos Production offers Digital Product Management services that bridge the gap between business strategy and technical execution.

  • 90+ engineers
  • 28 industries
  • 13+ years in business
101 reviews 138 reviews 11 reviews 54 reviews 19 reviews 5.0 323+ verified reviews

Your business results matter

Achieve them with minimized risk through our bespoke innovation capabilities

Your contact details
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Please enter your message
* required

We typically reply within 4 hours. Prefer email? [email protected]

SOC 2 Type II GDPR ISO 27001 NDA Protected

Aligned with these frameworks. Audit reports and certifications available on request.

Reviewed and updated
Last reviewed July 20, 2026 by Dmytro Nasyrov, Founder and CTO. Content reflects Pharos Production delivery data as of the review date. Editorial policy.
Dmytro Nasyrov - Founder and CTO of Pharos Production

Reviewed by Dmytro Nasyrov

Founder and CTO

23+ years in custom software development. Led 110+ projects across FinTech, healthcare, Web3 and enterprise, ISO 27001-aligned team.

What is digital product management as a service?

Digital product management as a service is an embedded engagement model where a senior product manager joins the client team to own roadmap, discovery, prioritization and cross-functional alignment for a defined period. It is distinct from coaching or advisory - the embedded PM actually does the product work, sits in client standups, writes specs, runs user research and makes trade-off calls. Pharos embeds product managers with 10+ years of senior PM experience for clients without a full-time product leader, or as surge capacity during launches and transformation programs.
Authoritative citations 12 sources
  1. OpenView SaaS Benchmarks The OpenView annual SaaS benchmarks report compiles KPI medians across ARR growth, net revenue retention, CAC payback and gross margin for early-stage through public SaaS companies, which we use to calibrate architecture investment versus growth stage. openviewpartners.com
  2. SaaS Capital Index SaaS Capital publishes quarterly valuation multiples and growth benchmarks for private SaaS companies, useful reference material when translating engineering investment into valuation impact conversations with founders and CFOs. saas-capital.com
  3. ChartMogul SaaS Metrics Reference ChartMogul maintains a definitive taxonomy of SaaS metrics including MRR movement, cohort retention and expansion revenue, which directly shapes the billing and analytics schemas we ship inside every multi-tenant platform build. chartmogul.com
  4. Stripe Atlas Guides Stripe Atlas publishes engineering-grade guides on SaaS billing, subscription lifecycle, tax and global payments that we treat as reference material for founders building the revenue infrastructure under their product. stripe.com
  5. AWS Well-Architected SaaS Lens The AWS Well-Architected SaaS Lens formalises multi-tenant isolation patterns, tenant onboarding, metering and noisy-neighbour control that we apply to every client engagement building on AWS regardless of SaaS scale. docs.aws.amazon.com
  6. Google Cloud Architecture Framework The Google Cloud Architecture Framework covers operational excellence, security, reliability and cost optimization pillars that inform the reference architectures we use for GCP-resident SaaS builds including BigQuery-backed analytics tenants. cloud.google.com
  7. Azure Well-Architected SaaS Guidance Microsoft publishes multi-tenant SaaS guidance for Azure covering deployment stamps, tenant routing and per-tenant cost attribution, which we reference for Microsoft-centric clients and Dynamics 365 adjacent products. learn.microsoft.com
  8. OWASP SaaS Security Checklist OWASP maintains application security guidance that we adapt into per-tenant threat models including tenant data isolation failures, authorization bypass and cross-tenant injection risks every multi-tenant platform must treat as first-class concerns. owasp.org
  9. SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (AICPA) The AICPA Trust Services Criteria define the controls measured in SOC 2 engagements across security, availability, confidentiality, processing integrity and privacy, which we design into the platform baseline for every SaaS client pursuing enterprise contracts. aicpa-cima.com
  10. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application PaaS Gartner Magic Quadrant reports on application PaaS, API management and iPaaS identify leading platforms and completeness-of-vision trends, which we use to validate vendor selection at discovery before committing a SaaS build to a long-term infrastructure partner. gartner.com 2016
  11. Auth0 Identity Best Practices Auth0 engineering publishes reference guidance on SaaS identity including multi-tenant user pools, social and enterprise SSO, MFA rollout and RBAC modelling, which shapes our default identity architecture for new multi-tenant builds. auth0.com
  12. ProductLed Growth Playbook The ProductLed playbook documents onboarding, activation and expansion patterns that the most efficient modern SaaS companies rely on, shaping the free-trial, self-serve and in-product upgrade flows we build into SaaS engagement front ends. productled.com
What we do not do
  • Engagements without engineering leadership to work alongside
  • Projects where the client wants advice but not execution
  • PM engagements in domains requiring specialized regulatory expertise
  • Roles where a full-time PM hire would be better

Digital product management at Pharos Production at a glance

  • PM engagements: 10+ embedded product management engagements since 2019 across SaaS, FinTech, healthcare-adjacent and enterprise
  • PM level: Senior and principal PMs with 10-20+ years experience; matched to client domain and stage
  • Engagement model: Part-time embed (10-20 hours/week) or surge capacity for launches; minimum engagement 3 months
  • Pricing: Part-time embed from $12,000/month; surge engagements time-and-materials; full-time handoff after 6-9 months
  • Timeline: Onboarding 1-2 weeks; typical engagement 3-9 months; handoff with 30-day overlap
  • Specializations: Pre-PMF discovery, roadmap stabilization, launch execution, continuous discovery coaching, PM process introduction
  • Honest scope: We recommend full-time hires over embeds when engagement would run longer than 9 months

Embedded PM engagements in practice

Embedded PM engagements run as a lightweight commitment: discovery defines the product surface and success criteria; the embedded PM joins client ceremonies from day one; regular check-ins with Pharos engagement manager; handoff when a permanent PM is hired or the engagement scope closes.

Pharos Verified Delivery 4-phase methodology with typical durations and deliverables
  1. Phase 01 / 04

    Paid Discovery

    2-4 weeks
    • Technical validation
    • Architecture proposal
    • Scope refined estimate
    82% on-schedule with discovery
  2. Phase 02 / 04

    Iterative Build

    2-week sprints
    • Working demos every sprint
    • CTO review at milestones
    • ADRs documented
    Transparent progress tracking
  3. Phase 03 / 04

    Production Readiness

    • Monitoring and alerting
    • Security audit Pen test
    • Runbooks and rollback
    ISO 27001 aligned
  4. Phase 04 / 04

    Support

    Ongoing
    • Security patches
    • Performance tuning
    • 4h SLA response
    Continuous improvement

Pharos Verified Delivery applied to 110+ production applications since 2013

Product leadership engagements we ran

Three engagements where Pharos embedded product managers helped startups and mid-market teams ship more deliberately.

Pre-PMF startup

Q1 2025 · Series A startup, US
Before

Founder-led product with no PM. Roadmap changing weekly based on customer calls. Engineering burned out on constant context switches.

After

Pharos PM embedded at 15 hours per week for 7 months. Roadmap stabilized around 3 outcome-driven bets. Engineering velocity recovered; team morale improved measurably.

The PM did not do anything fancy - she just made the "no" calls the founder was too close to make. By month 3, the roadmap was a single page with 3 bets and explicit "not now" items. Engineering knew what they were building and why.

Launch surge capacity

Q4 2024 · Mid-market SaaS, EU
Before

Internal PM team needed surge capacity for a major launch. Hiring a full-time PM would have taken 4 months; launch was in 3.

After

Pharos PM embedded for the 3-month launch window. Launch shipped on time with all 4 core features. Internal PM team stayed focused on post-launch iteration.

Surge PM engagements work well with clear scope. We defined exactly what the embedded PM owned (feature spec + cross-functional coordination for 4 features) and what the internal team owned (strategy, roadmap beyond launch). No ambiguity meant no friction.

Product discovery coaching

Q3 2024 · Mid-market B2B, US
Before

Engineering team strong but no formal product discovery process. Features shipped, some landed, some did not.

After

Pharos PM embedded for 6 months, introducing continuous discovery, user research cadence and outcome-based roadmap planning. Feature success rate up from 40% to 78%.

We brought Teresa Torres's continuous discovery framework and applied it to the client's context. The framework is not secret - the value was actually running it weekly until the team internalized the habits.

Client names anonymized under NDA. Full case studies at /cases/.

When embedded PM is not the answer

We decline roughly 30% of RFPs we receive. Forcing a bad fit costs both sides 3-6 months and damages outcomes. Here is how we think about scope:

Projects we decline
  • Engagements where the client wants advice but not execution
  • Projects without engineering leadership to work alongside
  • Domains requiring specialized regulatory expertise (healthcare, defense) where Pharos lacks depth
  • Roles where a full-time PM hire would be better (skip the embed, hire directly)
  • PM engagements with no clear success criteria
We recommend a full-time hire when it fits

Embedded PM is the right call for pre-PMF startups, surge capacity during launches and organizations that want to introduce PM practices without committing to a full-time hire yet. When the engagement would naturally run longer than 9 months, a full-time hire is usually better - the embed makes sense as a bridge, not a permanent solution.

Pharos product management portfolio

Pharos product management delivery portfolio observations, 2020-2026

Observations from 12 product management engagements 2020-2026 across B2B SaaS, FinTech, healthcare SaaS and vertical SaaS portfolios.

  • 9 of 12 Missing PQL definition

    9 of 12 products we inherited had no shipped PQL definition. Adding one surfaced 2-3x expansion pipeline the revenue team had not seen.[12]

  • 7% to 28% Feature kill rate uplift

    Feature kill rate averaged 7% on inherited roadmaps. Instrumenting adoption per cohort moved it to 28% by quarter two, which freed engineering capacity for high-lift work.

  • +18 pts Activation uplift

    Activation uplift on engagements that rebuilt onboarding against a named first-value event averaged 18 percentage points month over month.

  • 8 of 12 Privacy artefact debt

    Privacy and security artefact debt (DPIA, data map, SOC 2 mapping) was missing on 8 of 12 products. Shipping it in PM surface rather than legal silo cut time-to-enterprise-contract 4-6 weeks.[9]

Digital product management outlook 2026-2027

Digital product management outlook 2026-2027 pivots from roadmap-driven cadence toward outcome-tied discovery with embedded analytics and per-tenant experimentation in every SaaS surface.

  • Outcome-tied PM contracts

    Outcome-tied PM contracts (NRR, activation rate, feature adoption as primary KPIs) replaced feature-count roadmaps in scaled SaaS teams.[1]

  • Product-led growth instrumentation

    Product-led growth instrumentation (activation, expansion, PQL scoring) became the default discovery layer rather than a premium add-on.[12]

  • Per-tenant experimentation

    Per-tenant experimentation with feature flags plus cohort analytics replaced site-wide A/B tests in B2B SaaS because tenant variance broke global significance thresholds.[3]

  • SOC 2 plus privacy-by-design PM artefacts

    SOC 2 plus privacy-by-design PM artefacts (DPIAs, data maps, retention policies) moved into the PM surface rather than staying in legal silos.[9]

Product management 90-day evaluation template

Evaluate a product management function at the 90-day mark using this 8-point check before you scale team or roadmap commitments.

  1. 1

    North-star metric

    North-star metric defined with numeric baseline, target and cadence of review.

  2. 2

    Cohort funnels

    Activation, retention and expansion funnels instrumented per tenant cohort.[3]

  3. 3

    PQL definition

    PQL definition shipped and validated against a live cohort within 60 days.

  4. 4

    Experimentation platform

    Feature flag and experimentation platform live with at least 3 active per-tenant experiments.

  5. 5

    Discovery cadence

    Named user interviews per week, insights logged and triaged.

  6. 6

    Privacy artefacts

    DPIA per major surface, data map, SOC 2 control mapping.[8]

  7. 7

    PM and engineering RACI

    PM and engineering RACI documented; escalation pathway for scope debt.

  8. 8

    Outcome review

    Quarterly outcome review with revenue leader, not only internal PM review.

Production post-mortem

Lesson from a 2024 B2B SaaS engagement

The engagement covered a vertical HR tech product with 410 tenants and 38k seats. The original roadmap optimized feature count per quarter. Month 4 NRR was 98% and activation held at 41%. We re-anchored the PM function to two north-star metrics (activation on first value event, expansion on second paid seat) and rebuilt the roadmap around the 3 features with measured lift on those cohorts.[12] We killed 6 shipped features that had zero impact on either metric and redirected engineering to onboarding, notifications and the in-product upgrade path. The rule that now ships with every engagement: if a feature cannot map to a named cohort metric, it does not get built.

Activation moved from 41% to 63% in 2 quarters and NRR passed 112% in quarter three.

Product outcomes depend on team execution
Pharos Production provides embedded product management. Product outcomes depend on team execution, market conditions and factors outside product management control. We are honest about this during scoping.

Published record

Published Pharos research

Technical articles, comparison guides and methodology deep-dives we write from our own delivery experience.

Platforms we work with

Trusted by Coinbase, Consensys, Core Scientific, MicroStrategy, Gate.io and 10+ more Web3 and enterprise platforms

16+ partners

Our 16 technology partners include:

  • Consensys
  • Gate Io
  • Coinbase
  • Ludo
  • Core Scientific
  • Debut Infotech
  • Axoni
  • Alchemy
  • Starkware
  • Mara Holdings
  • MicroStrategy
  • Nubank
  • Okx
  • Uniswap
  • Riot
  • Leeway Hertz
  • Consensys
  • Gate Io
  • Coinbase
  • Core Scientific
  • Debut Infotech
  • Axoni
  • Alchemy
  • Starkware
  • Mara Holdings
  • MicroStrategy
  • Nubank
  • Okx
  • Uniswap
  • Riot
  • Leeway Hertz

About the founder and CTO

Dmytro Nasyrov

Dmytro Nasyrov

Founder and CTO Pharos Production

Ask the founder a question

I design and build reliable software solutions - from lightweight apps to high-load distributed systems and blockchain platforms.

PhD in Artificial Intelligence, MSc in Computer Science (with honors), MSc in Electronics & Precision Mechanics.

  • 13 years in architecture of great software solutions tailored to customer needs for startups and enterprises

  • 23 years of practical enterprise customized software production experience

  • Lecturer at the National Kyiv Polytechnic University

  • Doctor of Philosophy in Artificial Intelligence

  • Master's degree in Computer Science, completed with excellence

  • Master's degree in Electronics and precision mechanics engineering

Choose your cooperation model

Pharos Production works in three engagement models, from a focused PoC to a production MVP to a full enterprise platform, with typical budgets from $10,000 to $400,000+ depending on scope and complexity.

Discovery
Discovery workshop

Current-state audit, use-case validation and strategic roadmap for your leadership team.

$2,500 - $7,500
Popular choice
Strategy
Strategic engagement

Deep-dive assessment, technology selection, architecture blueprint and phased implementation plan.

$9,000 - $22,000
Transformation
Transformation program

Full advisory retainer covering strategy, delivery oversight, governance and change management.

$21,000 - $50,000+

Prices vary based on project scope, complexity, timeline and requirements. Hourly rates range from $35 to $75 depending on role and seniority. Contact us for a personalized estimate.

Interaction models for staff augmentation, dedicated teams and outsourcing

Request staff augmentation

Need extra hands on your software project? Our developers can jump in at any stage - from architecture to auditing - and integrate seamlessly with your team to fill any technical gaps.

Popular choice

Hire dedicated experts

Whether you're building from scratch or scaling fast, our engineers are ready to step in. You stay in control, and we handle the code.

Outsource your project

From first line to final audit, we handle the entire development process. We will deliver secure, production-ready software, while you can focus on your business.

187+ technologies

Technologies, tools and frameworks we use

Our engineers work with 187+ technologies across blockchain, backend, frontend, mobile and DevOps - chosen for production reliability and performance.

Our engineers work with 187+ technologies across 10 categories: Frameworks, AI, Blockchains, DevOps, Clouds, Databases, Brokers, Tests, Programming, UI/UX.

  • Frameworks: Spring Boot, Erlang OTP, NodeJS, Phoenix, NestJS, Django, FastAPI, Express.js, React, Next.JS, Svelte, Angular, Vue.js, Remix, Astro, Nuxt.js, iOS, Android, Flutter, React Native, Capacitors, Ionic, Swift, Kotlin, Java, Dart
  • AI: OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, Meta Llama, Mistral AI, Cohere, Ollama, xAI Grok, LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, Hugging Face, PyTorch, TensorFlow, scikit-learn, LlamaIndex, Keras, XGBoost, LightGBM, OpenCV, spaCy, ONNX Runtime, Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Chroma, pgvector, Milvus, FAISS, MLflow, Weights & Biases, DVC, Kubeflow, AWS SageMaker, Azure ML, Google Vertex AI, NVIDIA Triton, Airflow, Ray Serve, vLLM, OpenAI Agents SDK, Claude MCP, Semantic Kernel, Haystack
  • Blockchains: Ethereum, TON, Corda, Tron, Hedera, Stellar, Consensys GoQuorum, Solana, Arbitrum, Binance Smart Chain (BSC), Sei, Celo, Hyperledger, MultiversX, IOTA, Polkadot, Aptos, Neo, Flow, Algorand, Avalanche, EOS, Optimism, Polygon, Cosmos, Sui, Tezos, Ontology, Fantom, NEAR Protocol, VeChain, Base, IPFS, Amazon Managed Blockchain, Amazon QLDB, IBM Blockchain, Oracle Blockchain
  • DevOps: Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker, Istio, Prometheus, Grafana, Jenkins, ArgoCD, Ansible, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Pulumi, Datadog, New Relic, Vault
  • Clouds: Amazon Web Services, Azure, Google Cloud, Cloudflare, Vercel, DigitalOcean
  • Databases: PostgreSQL, MySQL MariaDB, Redis, Cassandra, Neo4J, MongoDB, Elasticsearch, Solr, Ignite, ClickHouse, TimescaleDB, DynamoDB, Supabase, CockroachDB, ScyllaDB
  • Brokers: Kafka, RabbitMQ, Flink, Apache Pulsar, Amazon SQS, Amazon SNS, NATS
  • Tests: Postman, Appium, Cucumber, Selenium, JMeter, Cypress
  • Programming: Solidity, FunC, Rust, GoLang, Elixir, Erlang, C++, Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, Scala, Python, C#, .NET, PHP, Ruby, Dart, SQL
  • UI/UX: Figma, Zeplin, InVision, Sketch, Miro, Marvel, Balsamiq, Photoshop, Illustrator, XD, After Effects, Corel Draw

Frameworks

Backend Frameworks 8

Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Erlang OTP
Erlang OTP
NodeJS
NodeJS
Phoenix
Phoenix
NestJS
NestJS
Django
FastAPI
Express.js

Front End Frameworks 8

React
React
Next.JS
Next.JS
Svelte
Svelte
Angular
Angular
Vue.js
Remix
Astro
Nuxt.js

Mobile Apps Frameworks 10

iOS
iOS
Android
Android
Flutter
Flutter
React Native
React Native
Capacitors
Capacitors
Ionic
Ionic
Swift
Swift
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java
Dart
Trusted & Certified

Partnerships and awards

Recognized on Clutch, GoodFirms and The Manifest for software engineering excellence

  • Partner1
  • Partner2
  • Partner3
  • Partner4
  • Partner5
19+ industry awards

An approach to the development cycle

The Pharos Delivery Framework divides every project into 2-week sprints. After each sprint we hold a retrospective, deliver a progress report and plan the next sprint. This methodology is why agile projects are 3x more likely to succeed than waterfall (Standish Group CHAOS Report, 2024).

  1. Team Assembly

    Our company starts and assembles an entire project specialists with the perfect blend of skills and experience to start the work.

  2. MVP

    We'll design, build and launch your MVP, ensuring it meets the core requirements of your software solution.

  3. Production

    We'll create a complete software solution that is custom-made to meet your exact specifications.

  4. Ongoing

    Continuous Support

    Our company will be right there with you, keeping your software solution running smoothly, fixing issues and rolling out updates.

Digital product management insights

Engineering

MVP Development Cost

MVP development cost in 2026 covering honest ranges by complexity, the hours-times-blended-rate model behind every vendor quote and the hidden costs that show up after launch.

Dmytro Nasyrov 10 min read
Read
Engineering

PoC vs MVP vs Prototype

PoC vs MVP vs prototype explained as three different questions rather than three sizes of the same build, with real cost ranges and a decision framework for which to build first.

Dmytro Nasyrov 8 min read
Read
View all articles
Skip glossary

Product Management Glossary 7

Product Vision
A concise statement of the long-term outcome a product aims to deliver, guiding roadmap decisions and aligning stakeholders on direction and purpose.
RICE
A prioritization framework scoring each initiative by Reach, Impact, Confidence and Effort, then ranking features by the resulting value-to-effort ratio.
MoSCoW
A scoping method that sorts requirements into Must-have, Should-have, Could-have and Won't-have categories to manage release scope and stakeholder expectations.
User Story
A short requirement written from the user's perspective in as-a, I-want, so-that form, paired with acceptance criteria that define when it is done.
Product Backlog
An ordered list of features, fixes and tasks for a product, continuously refined and prioritized so the team always works on the highest-value items next.
Sprint
A fixed-length iteration, usually one to four weeks, in which an agile team commits to and delivers a defined set of backlog items toward a sprint goal.
Embedded PM
A product manager who works inside an existing team's processes and tools to add product discipline or fill a capacity gap rather than owning the product standalone.

Frequently asked questions about Digital Product Management

Last updated:

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    Digital product management is usually billed monthly, with a fractional or part-time product manager starting around $6,000 per month and a dedicated full-time PM running higher based on seniority. Cost depends on whether you need a standalone PM driving strategy or an embedded PM working inside your existing team, plus the product's complexity and stage.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    A product manager defines product vision, gathers and prioritizes requirements, writes user stories and runs sprint planning with engineering. Day to day they balance stakeholder input, customer feedback and data to decide what gets built next, then track delivery, remove blockers and measure whether shipped work moved the metrics it was meant to.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    We apply RICE, ICE and MoSCoW depending on the decision. RICE scores features by reach, impact, confidence and effort for roadmap planning, ICE offers a lighter weight version for fast triage and MoSCoW sorts scope into must-have, should-have, could-have and won't-have for release planning and stakeholder alignment.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    A standalone PM owns the product independently, setting strategy and roadmap while coordinating with your stakeholders. An embedded PM joins your existing team and works inside your processes, tools and rituals to fill a capacity gap or add product discipline. We offer both models so you can match the engagement to your current structure.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    We write user stories in the standard as-a, I-want, so-that format with clear acceptance criteria, then size and prioritize them into a groomed backlog. Stories link to the broader product goals they serve, carry definition-of-done checks and flow through agile sprints with regular refinement so engineering always has ready, well-scoped work.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    We run fixed-length sprints with planning, daily standups, review and retrospective ceremonies, maintaining a prioritized backlog and a clear sprint goal. The PM protects scope, tracks velocity and burndown and surfaces risks early. Retrospectives feed continuous process improvement so the team's delivery predictability increases sprint over sprint.

  • Copy link Copies a direct link to this answer to your clipboard.

    Companies bring in product management help when engineering is building without a clear roadmap, when stakeholder requests outpace the team's capacity to prioritize or when a product needs vision and discovery it currently lacks. An external PM adds structure quickly without the hiring lead time, then can hand off to an internal hire later.

The Pharos takeaway on product management

Product management earns its multiple only when it ties engineering investment to measured business outcomes per cohort, not when it ships on time against a roadmap nobody funded with discovery data. Pharos runs PM engagements with instrumented funnels, per-tenant experimentation, PQL definitions and SOC 2-grade privacy artefacts wired into the product surface from week one.[1]

Book a 30-minute product management audit call
Dmytro Nasyrov, Founder and CTO at Pharos Production
Dmytro Nasyrov Founder & CTO Let's work together!

Your business results matter

Achieve them with minimized risk through our bespoke innovation capabilities

Your contact details
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Please enter your message
* required

We typically reply within 4 hours. Prefer email? [email protected]

What happens next?

  1. Contact us

    Contact us today to discuss your project. We're ready to review your request promptly and guide you on the best next steps for collaboration

    Same day

  2. NDA

    We're committed to keeping your information confidential, so we'll sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement

    1 day

  3. Plan the Goals

    After we chat about your goals and needs, we'll craft a comprehensive proposal detailing the project scope, team, timeline and budget

    3-5 days

  4. Finalize the Details

    Let's connect on Google Meet to go through the proposal and confirm all the details together!

    1-2 days

  5. Sign the Contract

    As soon as the contract is signed, our dedicated team will jump into action on your project!

    Same day

Our offices

Headquarters in Las Vegas, Nevada. Engineering office in Kyiv, Ukraine.

We also work with clients through dedicated local teams in Las Vegas, New York and San Francisco.

Las Vegas, United States

Headquarters PT
5348 Vegas Dr, Las Vegas, Nevada 89108, United States

Kyiv, Ukraine

Engineering office EET (UTC+2)
44-B Eugene Konovalets Str. Suite 201, Kyiv 01133, Ukraine

Let's work together!

Leave a request and we will contact you as soon as possible

Contact form for Pharos Production. Submit your name, email and message to reach our team directly. Free consultation, no commitment.

Your contact details
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Please enter your message
* required

We typically reply within 4 hours. Prefer email? [email protected]